[exim] readsocket request string format?

Hi, simple question, i did not find it in the docs: Is there any guarantee about the ending of readsocket request string? Is this always a zero-terminated c-string? ${readsocket{}{}{}{}{}} Christoph -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim detail

[exim] Yet another address rewrite question

Hi, i need to do a (sender-) rewrite like explained in FAQ 801 https://github.com/Exim/exim/wiki/Q0801 *@*.your.domain $1@your.domain This relies on a "hardcoded" domain name; what i'd like to have is something like this: *@*.${domain_without_hostname} $1@${domain_without_hostname} So

Re: [exim] Can I make messages destinated to local user/domain go through smarthost

Benoît Taine writes: [...] >> If you're using Debian's configuration, then selecting "mail sent by >> smarthost; no local mail" at the first stage of dpkg-reconfigure >> exim4-config should have the desired effect. Under that configuration, >> no domains are considered local, and everything is f

Re: [exim] SPAM Filtering - Losing the war!

Moin! Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Junk mail is war. RFCs do not apply." > --Wietse Venema Wietse... i do not like him, but in this special case he is right. > > Hello! > > With the recent upsurge of spam, I am strongly compelled to ask: > > Is there an

Re: [exim] Testing sending hosts open ports

Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just wondering how to do this. man programming > I'd like to test to see if the sending host at port 25 open. man telnet > Would this be a good way to detect spammers? *lol* > Would a host sending email to my host not have port 25 open to receive >

Re: [exim] Bad SMTP commands?

Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there any way to count bad SMTP commands? Yes. Christoph -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Re: [exim] Brain Teaser - how would you do this?

Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK - here's what I want to do. I want to forward a copy of selected > email to another email address, but only if the email address that I > want to forward to is a valid working email address. Interesting idea. > So - I need to do a callout and check i

Re: [exim] replacing headers in ACLs

Stanislaw Halik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Apr 02, 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> i'm trying to replace headers in the ACLs, so i could hint >>> SpamAssassin (through exiscan-acl) about the status of callout >>> verification. >> I do not think that this is a good idea. If you *reall

Re: [exim] replacing headers in ACLs

Stanislaw Halik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > i'm trying to replace headers in the ACLs, so i could hint > SpamAssassin (through exiscan-acl) about the status of callout > verification. I do not think that this is a good idea. If you *really* want to use callout verification, pass the info

Re: [exim] mail to myself is rejected

Chris Purves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If I send a message to myself using a 3rd party SMTP server, exim > rejects the mail and I receive the following message in the returned > mail: [...] > How can I debug this problem? Add log_selector = +all to your exim config. hth, good night, Chr

Re: [exim] Compile time problems

David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 09:19 +0200, David Saez Padros wrote: >> you need to compile and install libspf2 before compiling exim > > As discussed before, however, you'd probably do better just to disable > the SPF support in Exim. It's not something you sh

Re: [exim] Hijacked "www" user for sending out spam

"list1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > It seems like somebody has hijacked "www" user for sending out spam > like there is no tomorrow. You can see a small section of my exim log > below or a little longer at this address: > http://www.dnsbureau.com/exim_main.log.txt I've been looking at

Re: [exim] Delivering mail for one user on two hosts

Jan-Piet Mens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a requirement to deliver incoming mail for users into mailboxes > located on two different machines, resulting in a message for > [EMAIL PROTECTED] having to be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Any ideas how to best ac

Re: [exim] install problem with exim4.54 + mysql make error on suse 9.0

bjt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > `perform_mysql_search': > : undefined reference to `mysql_fetch_row' > lookups/lookups.a(mysql.o)(.text+0x46b): In function [...] > LOOKUP_INCLUDE=-I /usr/include/mysql > LOOKUP_LIBS=-L /usr/lib/mysql > > > > what is wrong???

Re: [exim] How hard can this be?

Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I want an ACL that will had a header if the header doesn't already > exist. If the header already exists - just do nothing. > > How hard can this be? Medium. hth, Christoph -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim

Re: [exim] Does EXIM need a new scripting language? - YES

Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK - I want to throw out a proposal to make a major change to Exim - > the scripting language. Ach, Perkelchen... feel free to implement it. hth, Christoph -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http:

Re: [exim] RFC1413 callout

Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Tony Finch wrote: > >> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > >> > On the other hand... it does not hurt. ;-) >> On the contrary, we turned it off because it is useless and because >> it caused complaints from users with pe

Re: [exim] RFC1413 callout

Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> On the other hand... it does not hurt. ;-) > > On the contrary, we turned it off because it is useless yes... > and because it caused complaints from users with personal firewalls. What did they complai

Re: [exim] RFC1413 callout

Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone find ident callbacks useful any more? anyone? dont know. ;-) /me does not. Most of the incomming connections continue after a timeout on ident. On the other hand... it does not hurt. ;-) Christoph -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/m

Re: [exim] 4.52 compile error on linux

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Who can help please now answer since 3 weeks ? Thanks Wolfgang > > - Weitergeleitet von Wolfgang Fuertbauer/EBEWE/AT am 30.08.2005 > 13:02 - > > Here ist what I get: who can help please ?! > > Linux saxophon 2.4.20-64GB-SMP #1 SMP Tue May 24 16:19:00 UTC 2005 >

Re: [exim] Relaying by email address

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I am in the middle of migrating to Domino from Exchange and I have the > following setup > > Exchaneg (mail1.com) ++ DomSrv1 (mail2.com) +--- [ > Exim Box ] - Internet > > My internet domain is mail1.com and I want incoming mail to specific > ema

Re: [exim] Exim4 Problem

"Elmar Leirich, CONCEPTNET GmbH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > I have Exim running on Debian. It works fine except that sometimes > mails from customers stay in the Outbox of their Mailclient and the > mail is resent endlessly... > > can anybode help me with this? Maybe. Christoph --

Re: [exim] Accept messages while offline

meka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm still on dial-up (don't blame me for I want to learn about > mail server :)). I want to make my exim accept messages while I'm > offline. Not so easy if the host is offline. ;-) i did it this way: have a host that is always online, deliver mail there