Re: [exim] Commercial spam scanning solution for exim

On Среда 18 июля 2007, Chris Laif wrote: > Hi. > > I'm currently searching for a commercial spam-scanning solution which > seamlessly integrates into exim. I'm not satisfied with SpamAssassin's > results and I'm not interested in spending hours tweaking the > rulesets. > > I had a quick look at www

[exim] [SOLVED] Re: user= in routers

On Суббота 31 марта 2007, dawnshade wrote: > On Суббота 31 марта 2007, Graeme Fowler wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 14:08 +0400, dawnshade wrote: > > > does option 'user = someusername' not worked into

Re: [exim] user= in routers

On Суббота 31 марта 2007, Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 14:08 +0400, dawnshade wrote: > > does option 'user = someusername' not worked into routers? > > spec.txt said: > > > > +--+ > > > &

[exim] user= in routers

Hi. does option 'user = someusername' not worked into routers? spec.txt said: +--+ |user|Use: routers|Type: string*|Default: see below| +--+ When a router queues an address for a transport, and the t

[exim] possible bug in smtp reply after dot

Hi! I found possible bug in smtp session when user telling dot and not waiting for server reply: %telnet mail.*.ru 25 Trying 217.* Connected to mail.*.ru. Escape character is '^]'. 220-mail.*.ru ESMTP greeting you... 220-Strongly recomended to use the fully-qualified domain name (FQDN) of the

Re: [exim] spamd nolonger called

On Wednesday 14 March 2007 23:42, Terry wrote: > Just reinstalled the latest version of exim on freebsd but for some > reason its no longer calling spamd and maybe not even clamd. > > exim -C /usr/local/etc/exim/configure -bV > Exim version 4.66 #0 (FreeBSD 4.10) built 14-Mar-2007 20:02:08 > Copyri

Re: [exim] maximum connection DDOS

On Sunday 26 November 2006 23:41, David Daniels wrote: > I'm getting joe-jobed. Bounces from everywhere from what spammers are > sending out using a few of my domain names. > > My exim stops processing incoming mail when it reaches a maximum number > of connections and simply puts these in the log

Re: [exim] Exim Segfault Error

On Tuesday 12 September 2006 01:13, Marc Perkel wrote: > UPDATE - checked the other servers and getting the same segfaults there > too. But they aren't locking up. S - it is Exim. > > Running on FC5 with 64 bit kernel. What can I do to help track this down? compile debug version exim (w/o strip) a

Re: [exim] OS Fingerprint Email

On Monday 19 June 2006 13:23, Ian Eiloart wrote: > > For those of you interested, I've outlined a method for OS > > Fingerprinting E-mail using FreeBSD and PF .. the details can be  found > > at > > > > http://blog.insidesystems.net/articles/2006/06/06/OS-Fingerprinting- > > Email > > Er, that's: >

Re: [exim] Misplaced Content-Type

On Saturday 27 May 2006 15:15, Dave Evans wrote: > Your first posting talked about the Content-Type and Subject headers.  I > don't see anything specifically wrong with those headers. yes, you right. i understand that i'm wrong. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-use

Re: [exim] Misplaced Content-Type

On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:32, Dave Evans wrote: > > I received many spammer emails with wrong placed MIME/Content-Type like > > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 22:15:31 -0500 > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: No Forms All orders filled V|AGR@ :can > > MIME-Ver

[exim] Misplaced Content-Type

Hello, all. Possible stupid question, but I received many spammer emails with wrong placed MIME/Content-Type like Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 22:15:31 -0500 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: No Forms All orders filled V|AGR@ :can MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Mu

Re: [exim] Stress testing an smtp server

On Wednesday 26 April 2006 23:34, Odhiambo G. Washington wrote: > I am looking for a tool that I can use to stress-test my SMTP server > (Exim, of course). I simply want to load the server to an extent that > would lead it to in turn stress the CPU and eat a considerable amount > of memory... > > G

Re: [exim] configuration Received?

On Saturday 25 March 2006 09:43, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > I try to change (i little bit) Received headers in my exim, it changed > > but strange. In configure i wrote: > > > > received_header_text = Received: \ > >   ${if def:sender_rcvhost {from $sender_rcvhost\n\t}\ > >   {${if def:sender_i

[exim] configuration Received?

Hello all. I try to change (i little bit) Received headers in my exim, it changed but strange. In configure i wrote: received_header_text = Received: \ ${if def:sender_rcvhost {from $sender_rcvhost\n\t}\ {${if def:sender_ident \ {from ${quote_local_part: $sender_ident} }}\ ${if def:send