> On Sep 11, 2018, at 5:35 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
>
> My proposal to change the OpenSSL API we use ran into the need to
> basically recreate the framework, because of LibreSSL declining to
> implement that new API.
I just compiled Exim master against OpenSSL 1.1.0 (in /usr/local)
on my
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 5:35 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
>
> My proposal to change the OpenSSL API we use ran into the need to
> basically recreate the framework, because of LibreSSL declining to
> implement that new API.
LibreSSL is basically OpenSSL 1.0.2, you don't have to wait for
LibreSSL to
On 2018-09-11 at 11:05 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni via Exim-users wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 03:37:12PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> > They may well find that applications just refuse to change.
>
> Debian Stretch ships with 1.1.0, applications are moving along.
My proposal to
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 03:37:12PM +0100, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
> One wonders if there exists a succinct definition of what the difference
> in the API is. The FAQ section on the openssl.org site doesn't have
> one.
The CHANGES file describes the changes between 1.0.2 and 1.1.0
One wonders if there exists a succinct definition of what the difference
in the API is. The FAQ section on the openssl.org site doesn't have
one.
They may well find that applications just refuse to change.
--
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
##
- Forwarded message from Matt Caswell -
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:01:38 +0100
From: Matt Caswell
To: openssl-us...@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] openssl 1.0.2 and TLS 1.3
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
On
