On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 05:49:42PM -0700, Rical Jasan wrote:
> On 03/17/2017 10:46 AM, Wayne wrote:
> >> Is there a reason to scan within comment blocks?
> >>
> > I assume based on the lack of responses that it's not expected that
> > comment content be scanned at all?
>
> The developers would hav
On 03/17/2017 10:46 AM, Wayne wrote:
>> Is there a reason to scan within comment blocks?
>>
> I assume based on the lack of responses that it's not expected that
> comment content be scanned at all?
The developers would have to tell you if it is intentional, but as a
user/administrator, I fully ex
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:03:22PM -0400, Wayne wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:15:56PM +0200, Lena--- via Exim-users wrote:
> > > >> It triggers when a macro name contains the sequence /_[ODH]/.
> > > >
> > > > Does it include $header_Date: ?
> > > > A workaround: $header_date:
> > >
> > > M
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:15:56PM +0200, Lena--- via Exim-users wrote:
> > >> It triggers when a macro name contains the sequence /_[ODH]/.
> > >
> > > Does it include $header_Date: ?
> > > A workaround: $header_date:
> >
> > Macro, not header.
>
> Even comment lines are searched for /_[ODH]/
>
> >> It triggers when a macro name contains the sequence /_[ODH]/.
> >
> > Does it include $header_Date: ?
> > A workaround: $header_date:
>
> Macro, not header.
Even comment lines are searched for /_[ODH]/
As far as I undrestand, every config line is searched before parsing.
So, such line trigg
On 13/03/17 14:33, Lena--- via Exim-users wrote:
>> It triggers when a macro name contains the sequence /_[ODH]/.
>
> Does it include $header_Date: ?
> A workaround: $header_date:
Macro, not header.
--
J
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details
> This loop appears to be the problem.
> It triggers when a macro name contains the sequence /_[ODH]/.
Does it include $header_Date: ?
A workaround: $header_date:
> You are also correct in that when macros_create_builtin() is not
> called the startup time is greatly reduced.
--
## List details
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 11:24:45AM +, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> With the 555 calls of macro_create() it does seem that the
> builtin macros are being activated. The place that happens
> is probably the call to macros_create_builtin() in
> get_config_line() - about line 1029 of readconf.c in
> mas
With the 555 calls of macro_create() it does seem that the
builtin macros are being activated. The place that happens
is probably the call to macros_create_builtin() in
get_config_line() - about line 1029 of readconf.c in
master HEAD. There's a commented-out printf on the line
before; please unco
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 11:15:57AM -0600, René Berber via Exim-users wrote:
> On 3/9/2017 10:46 AM, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>
> > On 09/03/17 16:20, lists-e...@useunix.net wrote:
> >> Unfortunately this is stuck running this on HPUX 11.2 at the moment.
> >> I don't have much installed aside from GCC/
On 3/9/2017 10:46 AM, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 09/03/17 16:20, lists-e...@useunix.net wrote:
>> Unfortunately this is stuck running this on HPUX 11.2 at the moment.
>> I don't have much installed aside from GCC/GDB but if you can make
>> some suggestions I'll be happy to do some research as time
On 09/03/17 16:20, lists-e...@useunix.net wrote:
> Unfortunately this is stuck running this on HPUX 11.2 at the moment.
> I don't have much installed aside from GCC/GDB but if you can make
> some suggestions I'll be happy to do some research as time permits.
>
> I also plan to take this config and
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:10:13AM +, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 09/03/17 02:16, lists-e...@useunix.net wrote:
> > Most of the time is spent in the while loop in readconf_main around
> > line 3424. All other portions of the function are negligible.
>
> That tells us it's reading the config...
>
On 09/03/17 02:16, lists-e...@useunix.net wrote:
> Most of the time is spent in the while loop in readconf_main around
> line 3424. All other portions of the function are negligible.
That tells us it's reading the config...
Can you dig deeper? What tools do you have?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
##
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:49:02AM -0500, lists-e...@useunix.net wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 07:56:12PM +, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> > On 04/03/17 22:27, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> > > Instrumenting the code with rudimentary timing metrics I found that on
> > > average in versions 4.66-4.87 readcon
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 07:56:12PM +, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 04/03/17 22:27, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> > Instrumenting the code with rudimentary timing metrics I found that on
> > average in versions 4.66-4.87 readconf_main takes < 9000
> > microseconds.
> >
> > On 4.88 it takes on average 6300
On 04/03/17 22:27, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> Instrumenting the code with rudimentary timing metrics I found that on
> average in versions 4.66-4.87 readconf_main takes < 9000
> microseconds.
>
> On 4.88 it takes on average 63000 microseconds.
4.88 added builtin macros (for assorted features) and a st
I've been running 4.66 on an internal HP-UX host for quite a long
time. We've recently upgraded the hardware and the OS so I figure now
is also a good time to upgrade EXIM to the latest.
This is a relatively high volume host, 100+ msgs per day that relays
mail to DMZ MX relays for internet des
18 matches
Mail list logo
