On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 09:55:01AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But doesn't a 'drop' also close the connection? You will never get t the
> RCPT.
[catching up slowly]
No. If you don't send a HELO or EHLO, you'll get to the smtp_rcpt_acl
without ever having hit the smtp_helo_acl, so you stil
> "Marc" == Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> (4) A selection of names, eg "localhost.localdomain".
Marc> During a period of time, newly installed Debian systems had
Marc> their /etc/hosts misconfigured in a way that an installed exim
Marc> 4 would HELO as localhost.localdomain. I
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 17:56:59 + (GMT), Jethro R Binks
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Marc Haber wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:14:27 + (GMT), Dennis Davis
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(4) A selection of names, eg "localhost.localdomain".
>>>
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 17:56:59 + (GMT), Jethro R Binks
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:14:27 + (GMT), Dennis Davis
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >(4) A selection of names, eg "local
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 17:56:59 + (GMT), Jethro R Binks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:14:27 + (GMT), Dennis Davis
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >(4) A selection of names, eg "localhost.localdomain".
>>
>> During a period of time,
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:14:27 + (GMT), Dennis Davis
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >(4) A selection of names, eg "localhost.localdomain".
>
> During a period of time, newly installed Debian systems had their
> /etc/hosts misconfigured in a way that an in
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 13:14:27 + (GMT), Dennis Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>(4) A selection of names, eg "localhost.localdomain".
During a period of time, newly installed Debian systems had their
/etc/hosts misconfigured in a way that an installed exim 4 would HELO
as localhost.localdomain.
bject: Re: [exim] A riddle: What HELO/EHLO does remote host send?
> LSN: Not Relevant
> User Filed as: Not a Record
>
> Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> > Thanks a lot! I've understood: some spammers ignore 550 code at HELO
> stage.
> > I've made additional
But doesn't a 'drop' also close the connection? You will never get t the
RCPT.
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exim users mailing list
cc: (bcc: Dan Mitton/YD/RWDOE)
Subject: Re: [exim] A riddle: What HELO/EHLO does remote host send?
LSN: Not Relevant
Use
Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> Thanks a lot! I've understood: some spammers ignore 550 code at HELO stage.
> I've made additional check in RCPT ACL.
You could enforce the use of helo at mail time. Do your deny at helo time,
then deny at mail time if helo is blank.
--
Lab tests show that use of mic
Peter Bowyer wrote:
> On 02/02/07, Alexander Shikoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > To discover some strange issue I've put some additional logging into HELO
> > and RCPT ACLs:
> >
> > acl_check_helo:
> >deny
> ># reject IP-addresses IN HELO/EHLO
> >
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> From: Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Exim users mailing list
> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:45:51 +
> Subject: Re: [exim] A riddle: What HELO/EHLO does remote host send?
...
> Since your HELO ACL rejected the HELO, and t
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 12:45:51PM +, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> On 02/02/07, Alexander Shikoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > To discover some strange issue I've put some additional logging into HELO
> > and RCPT ACLs:
> >
> > acl_check_helo:
> >deny
> ># reje
On 02/02/07, Peter Bowyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sent 201.250.194.147.
Typo of course. 201.250.198.147
--
Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with t
On 02/02/07, Alexander Shikoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> To discover some strange issue I've put some additional logging into HELO
> and RCPT ACLs:
>
> acl_check_helo:
>deny
># reject IP-addresses IN HELO/EHLO
>message = Bad HELO/EHLO
>
Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> To discover some strange issue I've put some additional logging into HELO
> and RCPT ACLs:
>
> acl_check_helo:
> deny
> # reject IP-addresses IN HELO/EHLO
> message = Bad HELO/EHLO
> condition =
> ${lookup
Hello,
To discover some strange issue I've put some additional logging into HELO
and RCPT ACLs:
acl_check_helo:
deny
# reject IP-addresses IN HELO/EHLO
message = Bad HELO/EHLO
condition =
${lookup{$sender_helo_name}nwildlsearch{BL_BAD_HELO
17 matches
Mail list logo