Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> Erik Schorr wrote:
>> In addition, someone who is legitimately using their own email account is
>> far
>> less likely to have a full mailbox than a mailbox whose email address was
>> used
>
> I wouldn't say that. In my experience 1/4 of the users tend to happily
> let
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> Erik Schorr wrote:
>> In addition, someone who is legitimately using their own email account is
>> far
>> less likely to have a full mailbox than a mailbox whose email address was
>> used
>
> I wouldn't say that. In my experience 1/4 of the users tend to happily
> let
Erik Schorr wrote:
> In addition, someone who is legitimately using their own email account is far
> less likely to have a full mailbox than a mailbox whose email address was
> used
I wouldn't say that. In my experience 1/4 of the users tend to happily
let (one of) their mailbox(es) grow to si
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Schorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exim users"
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [exim] Allowing sender verify when sender over quota
> In addition, someone who is legitimately using their own email account i
Jethro R Binks wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, John Horne wrote:
(snip)
> If a server returns any 5xx return code, it is saying "this is a permanent
> failure, I do not want you to try and deliver a message here to that
> address". Any more is purely informational.
>
> Since the point of sender
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, John Horne wrote:
> Running Exim 4.62, we use sender verification.
Using callouts? An admission which is rant-bait for some!
> However, it seems that if the original sender has exceeded their mailbox
> quota, then when Exim performs the sender verification it receives back
Hello,
Running Exim 4.62, we use sender verification. However, it seems that if
the original sender has exceeded their mailbox quota, then when Exim
performs the sender verification it receives back a 552 code.
Subsequently the message is rejected.
Does anyone know if it is possible to allow send
