Message-
From: Exim-users [mailto:exim-users-bounces+s.choudhury=bbk.ac...@exim.org] On
Behalf Of Graeme Fowler
Sent: 13 November 2015 14:45
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] eximstats output
On 13 Nov 2015, at 13:42, Sujit Acharyya-choudhury
wrote:
> I am producing eximstats us
On 13 Nov 2015, at 13:42, Sujit Acharyya-choudhury
wrote:
> I am producing eximstats using eximstats -nr -t_remote_users -byemail -byhost
>
> And get the following result :
> Any idea of the difference between Messages and Emails? What does the
> Addresses of 40892 mean in the Delivered Row?
I am producing eximstats using eximstats -nr -t_remote_users -byemail
-byhost
And get the following result :
Grand total summary
---
At least one address
TOTAL Volume Messages Addresses Hosts Emails
Delayed Failed
Received3169MB
Hi Michael,
I've done a fix for the HELO spoofing exim log line real IPs issue and
it will be in the Exim version 4.82 release.
Thanks,
Steve
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list
Hi Michael
First eximstats bug reported in 5 years!
eximstats uses the verified IP wherever it can. Sounds like it's being
fooled by giving that specific HELO which mimics how exim logs the real
IP.
I'll take a look and see if I can do a fix.
Steve
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.o
I was recently reviewing my mail logs from last month, and found
something odd in the summary produced from Eximstats:
> Top 50 rejected ips by message count
>
> Messages Rejected ip
>180 [192.168.2.33]
> 24 [114.36.128.171]
> 22
eximstats is a good tool to see the behavior of the mail server.
In the normal output we can see the:
Time spent on the queue: all messages
-
Under 1m 787 99.7% 99.7%
5m2 0.3% 100.0%
it is possible to see also what messages have b
Ah!! I see, ok thats great!
Many thanks Warren and Nigel,
cheers Andy :)
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
On 28/05/2008, Andy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Warren,
>
> yep, I thought of that and have tried it out and it seems ok. But I had
> an idea that not all lines of the mainlog
> for a given domain would actually contain the domain as a text string, for
> example where there is an entr
On 28 May 2008, at 11:05, Andy Smith wrote:
> yep, I thought of that and have tried it out and it seems ok. But I
> had an idea that not all lines of the mainlog
> for a given domain would actually contain the domain as a text
> string, for example where there is an entry
> refering to a tran
Hi Warren,
yep, I thought of that and have tried it out and it seems ok. But I had an
idea that not all lines of the mainlog
for a given domain would actually contain the domain as a text string, for
example where there is an entry
refering to a transaction just by the ID field, for example som
On 28/05/2008, Andy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can someone advise me if its possible to run the eximstats tool to
> provide statistics based on the destination domain? We host mutliple domains
> on our exim servers and a customer has asked if we can provide statistics on
> recie
Hi,
can someone advise me if its possible to run the eximstats tool to provide
statistics based on the destination domain? We host mutliple domains on our
exim servers and a customer has asked if we can provide statistics on recieved
mail and also rejected mail but it doesnt seem possible usi
;>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:30:03 +0100 (BST) , Steve Campbell <[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Oliver,
>>>
>>> Can you send me a small sample mainlog to work on (feel free to mangle the
>>> IPs/domains in it) and I'l
is it possible to show the top 50 domains receiving email on my mailserver with
eximstats?
my mailservers handle mail for around 1000 domains, so it would be interesting
to get a breakdown
of how much goes where.
--
Oliver Howe
Senior Systems Administrator
Tel: +44 (0) 79 7420 6484
Fax: +4
> Give this a try:
> eximstats -$YOUR_OPTIONS \
> -pattern "Total rejected SPAM Mails:" "/your message scored/"
I'm already using it as stated in my post of the 8th. In my case, I want to
use the new eximstats functionality for SpamAssassin but didn't know what to
expect. Might be great to have a
Hello Emmanuel,
Emmanuel Stapf [ES], 16.01.2007 (d.m.y):
> Sorry it took so long to try the new version of eximstats which I downloaded
> from http://www.computurn.com/exim/. I've located the message and patched it
> to
> my message, but as far as I can tell it does not seem to work. Since I don
Steve Campbell wrote:
> If you have customised your own rejection message, then this
> will be why it does not show. We currently look for the
> following SpamAssassin messages:
>
> /Action: ((permanently|temporarily) rejected message|flagged
> as Spam but accepted): score=(\d+\.\d)/
Sorry it
You can obtain the latest version of eximstats from:
http://www.computurn.com/exim/
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Stapf [ES] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2007 23:04
To: Campbell,S,Steve,XJE5A C; exim-users@exim.org
Subject: RE: [exim] eximstats and spamassassin
this.
Thanks,
Manu
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 4:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; exim-users@exim.org
> Subject: RE: [exim] eximstats and spamassassin
>
> Unfortunately exim does not currently have a
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:39:50PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Unfortunately exim does not currently have a standard rejection message
> format, so eximstats has to explicitly parse for known rejection
> messages.
>
> If you have customised your own rejection message, then this will be why
>
:
/Action: ((permanently|temporarily) rejected message|flagged as Spam but
accepted): score=(\d+\.\d)/
Steve Campbell
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Stapf [ES] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 January 2007 16:54
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: [exim] eximstats and spamassassin
Hi
Hi,
I've read in the change log of 4.63 the following:
SC/02 Collect SpamAssassin and rejection statistics in eximstats.
Don't display local sender or destination tables in eximstats unless
there is data to show.
Added average volumes into the eximstats top table text output.
H
gmane wrote:
> It's possible with eximstats to display statistics about size of
> messages received, grouped by distinct local domains? I got only the
> value of total size as generic "local" or the value for non local domains.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Look at the examples for 'pattern', and at your l
It's possible with eximstats to display statistics about size of
messages received, grouped by distinct local domains? I got only the
value of total size as generic "local" or the value for non local domains.
Thanks.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Ex
>What difference does the fact that you have exim4 make? Your eximstats
>was most probably installed as part of exim4.
He dont found this URL.
have i have found it online:
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.50/doc/html/spec.html
please answer always to the list. not privat
bye
marcus
___
Hello,
i would like to try eximstats.
In the documention i found this entry:
There are quite a few options for eximstats to control exactly what it
outputs. These are documented in the Perl script itself, and can be
extracted by running the command perldoc on the script. For example:
perldoc
It's version 1.43.
I cleared the Mysql Logs
eximstats-sends
eximstats-smtp
and the
exim-mainlog
That cleared up eximstats and started to run a little bit faster
Steve Campbell wrote:
>
> Versions of eximstats prior to V1.40 used an amount of memory
> proportional to the number of log line
Versions of eximstats prior to V1.40 used an amount of memory
proportional to the number of log lines being processed. Running over a
very large number of log lines would cause eximstats to use more and more
memory, and the server to run slower and slower, until something gives.
Could this be y
Nothing in messages regarding exim or eximstats just ftp. If you dont have an
answer to this that is perfectly fine. I just wanted to see if anyone knows
how-to find out what happened.
Steven Wayne-2 wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:15:41AM -0700, altendew wrote:
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> "exims
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:15:41AM -0700, altendew wrote:
>
> Nope.
>
> "eximstats failed @ Tue Aug 22 10:01:37 2006. A restart was attempted
> automagicly."
>
Not the most helpful of messages. Is there anything in /var/log/messages ?
In answer to your original question, I suspect your server
Nope.
"eximstats failed @ Tue Aug 22 10:01:37 2006. A restart was attempted
automagicly."
Steven Wayne-2 wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:15:29AM -0700, altendew wrote:
>>
>> For some reason my server will get really slow and pages will drag
>> horribly.
>> Then I will receive an e-mail
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:15:29AM -0700, altendew wrote:
>
> For some reason my server will get really slow and pages will drag horribly.
> Then I will receive an e-mail saying eximstats failed. I am running my
> server on a redhat linux box. How could I check to see why exim failed and
> if it i
For some reason my server will get really slow and pages will drag horribly.
Then I will receive an e-mail saying eximstats failed. I am running my
server on a redhat linux box. How could I check to see why exim failed and
if it is the cause of the server dragging?
Thanks
--
View this message in
Eximstats v1.47 is now available from
http://www.computurn.com/exim/
This release adds information on the number of message recipients (a
single message counts as one delivery, even if it has multiple
receipients) and adds 'Message too big' to mail rejection parsing.
Any problems, just let me
Hi list,
I have 8 months worth of eximstats output for a dozen or so servers
that I would like to be inserted into a Mysql DB. Primarily I am only
interested in messages per hour. Once I get that working then branching
out to include all other information should be relatively straight forward
Steve, are you working on that or should I?
Just want to avoid double work ...
Thanks
- Karl
Karl Fischer wrote:
Steve Campbell wrote:
Karl,
Guess who else was working on this today :-)
It was a bit more work, but we now output the address (recipient)
statistics in addition to the mes
Steve Campbell wrote:
Karl,
Guess who else was working on this today :-)
It was a bit more work, but we now output the address (recipient)
statistics in addition to the message statistics. You can be the first
person to test it!
eximstats version 1.36? Gosh. That version's a year old today
Steve Campbell wrote:
Karl,
The reason that only '=>' lines are counted as each one of these
represent a message sent down a transport and significant work done.
Each '->' line is an additional address at the same destination which
does not require a new message to be sent and is not a signi
Karl,
The reason that only '=>' lines are counted as each one of these
represent a message sent down a transport and significant work done.
Each '->' line is an additional address at the same destination
which does not require a new message to be sent and is not a
significant amount of work.
Hi Exim users,
I'm fairly new to exim(4) and I'm still learning (who isn't?), so
please excuse me if you find this a stupid request ...
I just found out about the eximstats utility, which is a GREAT tool,
however, I've been confused with the numbers it showed me compared
to my own statistics, u
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> This reminds me of the message I once posted, but never received reply
> to. When fixing the above issue, it would be good to investigate that
> issue as well.
If I recall correctly, I did take a look at this, and got nowhere.
--
Philip Hazel
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:42:39PM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
> > The parsing for rejection lines is a bit of a mess, and fairly
> > unmaintainable. Do you think it would be possible to standardise
> > rejection/refusal log messages? How about somethi
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Steve Campbell wrote:
> The parsing for rejection lines is a bit of a mess, and fairly
> unmaintainable. Do you think it would be possible to standardise
> rejection/refusal log messages? How about something like:
>
> (|16 Spaces) *< (Connection|MAIL|RCPT|HELO|EHLO|DATA) reje
Eximstats 1.44 is now available.
This version incorporates statistics gathering for sa-exim
(SpamAssassin) log messages and for rejection logs.
You can obtain it from:
http://www.computurn.com/exim/
I think the rejection parsing is fairly comprehensive, but would
appreciate it if the community
I have two quick feature requests for eximstats. Has anybody written support
for XML output from eximstats? Normally I don't like XML but I can see a
very valid case for it here, as output could be converted to many other
formats (txt, pdf, xhtml) quite easily using XSLT. If nobody else has
Hello Steve,
Monday, July 18, 2005, 6:13:45 PM, you wrote:
SC> eximstats marks a message as from a local sender if it does
SC> not see a 'H=' attribute. It will then take the user from
SC> the 'U=' attribute.
SC> Can you send some sample mainlog lines containing the strange local-sender?
Yes of
>> Top 50 local senders by message count
>>
>> MessagesBytes Average Local sender
>> 229KB15KBDebian-exim
>> 129072907B-396316870
>>
>>
>> I have no such users at all. As far as I understand it is
>> responses to ident callbacks.
>Debian-exim i
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:05:11PM +0900, Loed wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a mail-server running exim-4.52. Periodically it generates
> statistics from log-files (eximstats utility).
>
> Recently I have found these entries:
>
> Top 50 local senders by message count
>
> MessagesBytes Av
Hello all,
I have a mail-server running exim-4.52. Periodically it generates
statistics from log-files (eximstats utility).
Recently I have found these entries:
Top 50 local senders by message count
MessagesBytes Average Local sender
229KB15KBDebian-exim
12
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Steve Campbell wrote:
> Chris Lear spotted a bug which I've fixed. I've updated the version in CVS to
> 1.43. Hope it's still in time for the release!
It wasn't, but it is now. :-)
--
Philip HazelUniversity of Cambridge Computing Service,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Philip,
Chris Lear spotted a bug which I've fixed. I've updated the version in CVS
to 1.43. Hope it's still in time for the release!
Thanks,
Steve
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Philip Hazel wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Steve Campbell wrote:
Thanks for checking. I got caught out by a trailing space
Chris,
Thanks for testing and spotting that. Fixed version is 1.43, available
from http://www.computurn.com/exim/
Steve
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Chris Lear wrote:
* Steve Campbell wrote (28/06/2005 21:59):
Eximstats 1.42 is now ready for release. It incorporates several changes
as requested b
* Steve Campbell wrote (28/06/2005 21:59):
> Eximstats 1.42 is now ready for release. It incorporates several changes
> as requested by Marc Sherman:
>
> 2005-06-03 V1.40 Steve Campbell
> Whilst parsing the mainlog(s), store information about
> the messages in a has
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Steve Campbell wrote:
> Thanks for checking. I got caught out by a trailing space! Sorted now.
Thanks! It will be in 4.52.
--
Philip HazelUniversity of Cambridge Computing Service,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4
Philip,
Thanks for checking. I got caught out by a trailing space! Sorted now.
Steve
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Philip Hazel wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Steve Campbell wrote:
Eximstats 1.42 is now ready for release. It incorporates several changes as
requested by Marc Sherman:
2005-06-03 V1.40
Eximstats 1.42 is now ready for release. It incorporates several changes
as requested by Marc Sherman:
2005-06-03 V1.40 Steve Campbell
Whilst parsing the mainlog(s), store information about
the messages in a hash of arrays rather than using
individual has
Johann,
Modern versions of eximstats (including the one in the Debian exim 4.51-1
distribution) will give a version number at the top of the help text.
The output you've shown does not include a version number, and only has
the options as were supported by very old versions of eximstats.
Th
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 12:15:03PM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> Looks like an ancient version of eximstats. Try "eximstats --help". This
> is what I get for a bad option:
Indeed!
After your message I did a "locate eximstats" and found a very old one
in my $PATH.
Sorry for bothering you about
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Johann Spies wrote:
> I have exim 4.51-1 installed on Debian Sid. According to the manpage
> of eximstats the following should work - but:
>
> $ eximstats -merge -html *txt
> Eximstats: Unknown or malformed option -merge
> Valid options are:
> -h histogram division
I have exim 4.51-1 installed on Debian Sid. According to the manpage
of eximstats the following should work - but:
$ eximstats -merge -html *txt
Eximstats: Unknown or malformed option -merge
Valid options are:
-h histogram divisions per hour
default is 1, 0 suppresses h
The latest release of eximstats is now available at
http://www.computurn.com/exim/
This incorporates the new ability to output the results as an Excel
spreadsheet courtesy of Frank Heydlauf and a few other minor changes
and fixes:
V1.37 Frank Heydlauf
Added -xls and the ability to specify ou
62 matches
Mail list logo
