Re: [exim] Getting the latest version for Debian Wheezy

Michael Grant wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: >> Am Sa den 12. Jul 2014 um 1:05 schrieb Michael Grant: >>> Does anyone on this list know what the state of getting 4.82.1 (or >>> whatever is latest) into the backports repository for Debian is? >> >> You can add a wi

Re: [exim] Getting the latest version for Debian Wheezy

On 13/07/14 00:49, Phil Pennock wrote: An important point is that thanks to Todd, we now have a buildfarm of agents building Exim on various platforms and submitting responses back to a tracker, so we can tell when builds and the test suite fail on a particular OS. So if we read "developed on" a

Re: [exim] Getting the latest version for Debian Wheezy

On 2014-07-12 at 01:05 +0100, Michael Grant wrote: > Out of curiosity, what version of unix/linux is exim developed on anyway? There's a team of people who do most of the work; Todd Lyons and Jeremy Harris are driving most of the recent work, you'd have to ask them. I drove several releases, and

Re: [exim] Getting the latest version for Debian Wheezy

Michael Grant wrote: [...] > So how can I know that any particular distribution is patched up to the > current bug fix level of the current level of a piece of software? [...] Hello, if you have got CVE numbers of the respective issues you can look at

Re: [exim] Getting the latest version for Debian Wheezy

On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi Folks, > > I'll start with the last mail I reply to. It makes more sense that way. > > Am Sa den 12. Jul 2014 um 16:28 schrieb Graeme Fowler: > > With respect folks, this is not the rig

Re: [exim] Getting the latest version for Debian Wheezy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Folks, I'll start with the last mail I reply to. It makes more sense that way. Am Sa den 12. Jul 2014 um 16:28 schrieb Graeme Fowler: > With respect folks, this is not the right mailing list for this discussion. > > There is a Debian-specific s

Re: [exim] Getting the latest version for Debian Wheezy

With respect folks, this is not the right mailing list for this discussion. There is a Debian-specific support list for Exim on Debian; I suggest you look in your package docs and follow from there. I'm sure the distribution maintainers will be happy to answer any questions. Graeme (obo Exim

Re: [exim] Getting the latest version for Debian Wheezy

On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 14:59 +0100, Michael Grant wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > > Am Sa den 12. Jul 2014 um 1:05 schrieb Michael Grant: > > > Does anyone on this list know what the state of getting 4.82.1 (or > > > whatever is latest) into the backports repository

Re: [exim] Getting the latest version for Debian Wheezy

Hi Klaus, On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Hi, > > Am Sa den 12. Jul 2014 um 1:05 schrieb Michael Grant: > > Does anyone on this list know what the state of getting 4.82.1 (or > > whatever is latest) into the backports repository for Debian is? > > You can add a wishlist b

Re: [exim] Getting the latest version for Debian Wheezy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Am Sa den 12. Jul 2014 um 1:05 schrieb Michael Grant: > Does anyone on this list know what the state of getting 4.82.1 (or > whatever is latest) into the backports repository for Debian is? You can add a wishlist bug for it. > It seems like t

[exim] Getting the latest version for Debian Wheezy

I'm using Debian Wheezy at the moment. The latest version for exim seems to be 4.80 for wheezy. 4.82.1 is available for Jessie (the next future version of Debian). However, sucking that into wheezy looks problematic because it also means sucking in a lot of other dependencies from Jessie. Does