Tim Jackson wrote:
>
> (Does anyone know how to name anchors sanely on the wiki?)
Nope. That's why I split DontObfuscate out to a separate page.
I think it'd probably be reasonable to split each significant example
out of that ExiscanExamples page, and leave it as an introductory/index
page.
Peter Bowyer wrote:
> - even more subtly, you can defer subsequent recipients which don't
> have the same reject preferences as the first (ie 2 or more domains
> might have the same preferences, so you can let them both through)
For the OP, there are examples here:
http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/E
(On-list please)
On 19/12/06, Exim User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Funny.
No, not funny - since the DATA ACL is run once per message, there's no
guarantee of a unique value for the destination domain - there could
be many.
> What are others doing to achieve this?
Many things
- you can i
On 19/12/06, Marc Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exim User wrote:
> >
> > condition = "${if and { \
> > { >{$spam_score_int}{150}} \
> > { eq{${domain}{mydomain.com}}}\
> > } \
> > {1}{0}}"
> >
> >
> > All I get is
> >> temporarily rejec
Exim User wrote:
>
> condition = "${if and { \
> { >{$spam_score_int}{150}} \
> { eq{${domain}{mydomain.com}}}\
> } \
> {1}{0}}"
>
>
> All I get is
>> temporarily rejected after DATA: failed to expand ACL string,
>> missing 2nd string in {
Dear list,
to my spam score ACL I added a second condition to get different thresholds
per domain:
deny message = This message seems to be spam. Spam score is $spam_score
points. If you think this is an error, contact the recipient directly.
spam = nobody:true
condition = "${if and { \
