Renaud Allard wrote:
> This thread explains many things about hotmail:
> http://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20070610.175605.a1be972b.en.html
>
While there is a lot of great hotmail information in that thread, it's
just about Hotmail eating your mail, this one was actually rejected at
smtp t
Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> On 3 Oct 2007 at 10:46, Stian Jordet wrote:
>> 2) Why did only six of the 16 Hotmail recipients fail? Oh, stupid me, I
>> just looked at the logs. It seems (logical enough) that when you use
>> bcc, it sends one and one recipient. Perhaps Hotmail doesn't like that?
>> Si
On 3 Oct 2007 at 10:46, Stian Jordet wrote:
> 2) Why did only six of the 16 Hotmail recipients fail? Oh, stupid me, I
> just looked at the logs. It seems (logical enough) that when you use
> bcc, it sends one and one recipient. Perhaps Hotmail doesn't like that?
> Since it stops accepting mails aft
Hi,
Stian Jordet wrote:
> I have a user which have a soccer contest going with his friends and
> co-workers. They are now about 60 participants. For a couple of years
> he have been sending out the results and standings to everyone
> participating. This have worked great.
[...]
> Two questions: 1)
Hi,
I have a user which have a soccer contest going with his friends and
co-workers. They are now about 60 participants. For a couple of years he
have been sending out the results and standings to everyone
participating. This have worked great.
This weekend I got a mail from him, telling me he ha
