On 4 Feb 2015, at 16:11, Reinier Carmona Lizana
wrote:
> Hello, excuse me for my defficient english, I am not a native speaker. I
> have 3 mx servers and I am trying to set the limit the quantity of email
> destination, I have this in my exim.conf
>
> MAX_RCPT = 10
>
> begin acl
>
> acl_check_
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Jasen Betts wrote:
>
>
> that will work for CC and BCC addresses too, but only on the
> originating server
>
> BCC can only be checked on the originating server
>
That's a bit imprecise.
I would say that the contents of the original Bcc field is ultimately only
kn
On 2015-02-04, Reinier Carmona Lizana wrote:
> Hello, excuse me for my defficient english, I am not a native speaker. I
> have 3 mx servers and I am trying to set the limit the quantity of email
> destination, I have this in my exim.conf
>
>
> MAX_RCPT = 10
>
> begin acl
>
> acl_check_rcpt:
>
> de
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 11:11 -0500, Reinier Carmona Lizana wrote:
> MAX_RCPT = 10
>
> begin acl
>
> acl_check_rcpt:
>
> deny message = Too many recipients
> log_message = Too many recipients. "$rcpt_count" rcpts
> condition = ${if >{$rcpt_count}{MAX_RCPT} {1}{0}}
Hello, excuse me for my defficient english, I am not a native speaker. I
have 3 mx servers and I am trying to set the limit the quantity of email
destination, I have this in my exim.conf
MAX_RCPT = 10
begin acl
acl_check_rcpt:
deny message = Too many recipients
log_message =
On tisdagen den 22 januari 2008, Sergio wrote:
> Dave,
> thanks a lot for your answer, it is appreciated.
>
> 4. Instead of blocking, you could just slow things down for mails with
> large recipient lists, e.g. by adding a "delay" into your RCPT ACL. Then
> the mail would still be allowed, and wou
Dave Evans wrote:
> 2. /Why/ do you want to limit this? I could understand if it was to control a
> malware flood being BCCd to 1000s of people at a time, but a "normal" mail to
> a couple of hundred people - what's the problem?
At least I think it may be good to limit it from a "netiquette" poin
Sergio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Di 22 Jan 2008 23:10:50 CET):
> Thanks a lot Heiko,
> is there a way to set a fixed delay? I mean 2 or 3 seconds on every email
> address?
>
> What it will be great is if the delay starts after the 10th email, so the
> first 10 will not have any delay at all, but after
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:42:49PM +0100, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> It slows things down, but I do not know, how the sending side would
> behave with large recipients lists. If after the 30th recipient the delay of
> 30s is too long for the sender, probably they will cancel the complete
> transa
Sergio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Di 22 Jan 2008 19:03:22 CET):
> Dave,
> thanks a lot for your answer, it is appreciated.
>
> 4. Instead of blocking, you could just slow things down for mails with large
> recipient lists, e.g. by adding a "delay" into your RCPT ACL. Then the mail
> would still be allo
Dave,
thanks a lot for your answer, it is appreciated.
4. Instead of blocking, you could just slow things down for mails with large
recipient lists, e.g. by adding a "delay" into your RCPT ACL. Then the mail
would still be allowed, and would still go through, but maybe the delay
would
help discou
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 10:39:12AM -0600, Sergio wrote:
> Hi,
> first of all I want to say hello to everybody in this list, very new around
> here. If I do something wrong, I ask you to please teach me and not to ban
> me.
Will do :-)
> Here is my question, I have some customers that are using my
Hi,
first of all I want to say hello to everybody in this list, very new around
here. If I do something wrong, I ask you to please teach me and not to ban
me.
Here is my question, I have some customers that are using my servers to send
emails to a bunch of people, not spam but customers and / or f
13 matches
Mail list logo
