On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Sander Smeenk wrote:
| Great! Can we stop quoting urls listed on surbl? All these mails end up
| in my spambox as they score below the drop treshold and above the
| spamtreshold.
You really really want to whitelist exim-users
( and other lists that are likely to discuss spa
Sander Smeenk wrote:
>> I've modified Erik Mugele's exim_surbl.pl utility for blocking URIBL in
>> Exim.
>
> Great! Can we stop quoting urls listed on surbl? All these mails end up
> in my spambox as they score below the drop treshold and above the
> spamtreshold.
>
> I might start rejecting m
Sander Smeenk wrote:
>
> Great! Can we stop quoting urls listed on surbl? All these mails end up
> in my spambox as they score below the drop treshold and above the
> spamtreshold.
You really should whitelist any mailing list you subscribe to on the
topic of mail server or spam scanner admin.
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Sander Smeenk wrote:
>
> > I've modified Erik Mugele's exim_surbl.pl utility for blocking URIBL in
> > Exim.
>
> Great! Can we stop quoting urls listed on surbl? All these mails end up
> in my spambox as they score below the drop treshold and above the
> spamtreshold.
>
> I mi
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Sander Smeenk wrote:
>> I've modified Erik Mugele's exim_surbl.pl utility for blocking URIBL in
>> Exim.
>
> Great! Can we stop quoting urls listed on surbl? All these mails end up
> in my spambox as they score below the drop treshold and above the
> spamtreshold.
>
> I might
> I've modified Erik Mugele's exim_surbl.pl utility for blocking URIBL in
> Exim.
Great! Can we stop quoting urls listed on surbl? All these mails end up
in my spambox as they score below the drop treshold and above the
spamtreshold.
I might start rejecting mails from exim-users and poison my b
Ted Cooper wrote:
> Mike Cardwell wrote:
>
>> Graeme Fowler wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 16:37 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
>>>
One of the important additions I made in the code was the addition of
checking against a whitelist database to eliminate false positives.
>
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Martin A. Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Marc Perkel wrote:
>>
>>> Definitely looking for feedback and improvements on this.
>>>
>>>
>> Any allegedly production quality Perl code needs to start with "use
>> stric
Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 16:37 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>> One of the important additions I made in the code was the addition of
>> checking against a whitelist database to eliminate false positives.
>>
>
> Small nit: that doesn't eliminate false positives. It elim
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Mike Cardwell wrote:
| Interestingly, I stopped getting any hits from that list after 21:30
| last night, and all of the domains above are no longer listed. I've
| checked from multiple source IPs.
Looks like something happened then. The hitrate dropped around that time,
Ted Cooper wrote:
>> existsshaded.com
>> dozencourier.com
>> orecopper.com
>> bedcalab.com
>> anrosite.com
>> searchvisiontech.com
>> cluttlergroup.com
>> dogsswim.com
>> phosphatefarmhouse.com
>> jadedistinguished.com
>>
>> None of those are were created within the last 5 days. Most of them were
Mike Cardwell wrote:
> Graeme Fowler wrote:
>> On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 16:37 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
>>> One of the important additions I made in the code was the addition of
>>> checking against a whitelist database to eliminate false positives.
>> Small nit: that doesn't eliminate false positive
12 matches
Mail list logo
