Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates

2006-08-01 Thread Marc Sherman
Jeremy Harris wrote: > > Does this imply that Exim+SA isn't doing a proper handshake around > the SMTP-dot-after-DATA? Or that MSN isn't? > Why does Exim think it has accepted the message, when MSN does not? It's pretty much a design flaw in the SMTP protocol. At least it errs on the side of dup

Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates

2006-08-01 Thread Tony Finch
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Chris Blaise wrote: > > Clearly the "problem" on my end is that the machine in question is > only 64MB and doing Sophos, ClamAV, and SpamAssassin scanning. SpamAssassin is a HUGE memory hog. You absolutely must ensure that your machine is not swapping any of the memory it

Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates

2006-08-01 Thread W B Hacker
Chris Blaise wrote: >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Balzer >>Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:03 AM >>To: exim-users@exim.org >>Subject: Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates >> >>

Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates

2006-08-01 Thread Chris Edwards
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Jeremy Harris wrote: | | Why does Exim think it has accepted the message, when MSN does not? | By the time Exim gives the 2xx response to DATA, MSN has already timed-out. RFC 1047 discusses this in detail. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-use

Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates

2006-08-01 Thread Jeremy Harris
Chris Blaise wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Balzer >> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:03 AM >> To: exim-users@exim.org >> Subject: Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates >>

Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates

2006-08-01 Thread Chris Edwards
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Chris Blaise wrote: | Clearly the "problem" on my end is that the machine in question is | only 64MB and doing Sophos, ClamAV, and SpamAssassin scanning. You're calling SpamAssassin via spamd, right ? Perhaps try turning off the SpamAssassin network tests, as something

Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates

2006-08-01 Thread Chris Blaise
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Balzer > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:03 AM > To: exim-users@exim.org > Subject: Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates > > > I can confirm this MSN behavior, one r

Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates

2006-08-01 Thread Christian Balzer
Tony Finch wrote: >On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Chris Blaise wrote: [MSN happily ignoring RFC timeouts] >> And/or is there a built-in way deal with this situation? > >The only way is to ensure that your machine is meaty enough to scan email >quickly. In particular you should ensure that SpamAssassin is tu

Re: [exim] Incoming duplicates

2006-07-31 Thread Tony Finch
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Chris Blaise wrote: > > 2006-07-28 07:23:11 1G6SGG-0007wS-Bh <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] That shows a delay of 175 seconds, based on the timestamp in the message ID (which is generated after Exim receives the message header), and the more readable log line timestamp (generated after

[exim] Incoming duplicates

2006-07-28 Thread Chris Blaise
One of my systems is receiving duplicates of the same message from certain remote servers. It does both spam and AV scanning in the DATA acl. According to the exim log id field, it's the same message: 2006-07-28 07:23:11 1G6SGG-0007wS-Bh <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=(bay0-om