I have the following ACL integrating spamassassin into my exim gateways.
I believe it is inefficient because I believe it is sending the message
to be evaluated by spamassassin many times. Am I correct and if so how
should I construct the logic to achieve the same result.
Thank You
GA
Send
gascione wrote:
I have the following ACL integrating spamassassin into my exim gateways.
I believe it is inefficient because I believe it is sending the message
to be evaluated by spamassassin many times. Am I correct and if so how
should I construct the logic to achieve the same result.
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, gascione wrote:
From: gascione [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: exim-users@exim.org
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:00:43 -0400
Subject: [exim] Not very efficient I believe
I have the following ACL integrating spamassassin into my exim
gateways. I believe it is inefficient because I
Dennis Davis Wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, gascione wrote:
From: gascione [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: exim-users@exim.org
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:00:43 -0400
Subject: [exim] Not very efficient I believe
I have the following ACL integrating spamassassin into my exim
gateways. I
Ted Cooper wrote:
gascione wrote:
I have the following ACL integrating spamassassin into my exim gateways.
I believe it is inefficient because I believe it is sending the message
to be evaluated by spamassassin many times. Am I correct and if so how
should I construct the logic to achieve the
