Hello W,
>>
>> .. and the lead Russian viagra spammer was slaughtered by the mafia. He
>> was supposed to be responsible for 30% of all that type of spam.
>>
> http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,138383-c,currentevents/article.html
> But one can wish.
Hmm... Donations, anyone? A little fund
On 15/10/2007, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If people want more traffic I could say something controversial to piss
> people off. :)
>
> How would you like to be pissed off today?
>
> 1. SPF sucks
> 2. Isn't Sender Address Verification wonderful?
> 3. How about retry on 550 error messag
If people want more traffic I could say something controversial to piss
people off. :)
How would you like to be pissed off today?
1. SPF sucks
2. Isn't Sender Address Verification wonderful?
3. How about retry on 550 error messages?
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo
W B Hacker wrote:
> Ted Cooper wrote:
>> W B Hacker wrote:
>>> Graeme Fowler wrote:
>>> Meanwhile, the alleged spammers of China are sweeping family tombs and
>>> such...
>>>
>>> Not a heavy keyboarding time anywhere, and the more WinBoxes de-powered,
>>> the
>>> more bots are imprisoned, so eve
Ted Cooper wrote:
> W B Hacker wrote:
>> Graeme Fowler wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 15:22 -0400, Tom Ray [Lists] wrote:
Compared and it seems the drop in traffic is legit. What I have in my
inbox is what is in the archives. So the answer is that no ones replied
to my previous m
Hi Tom
Tom Ray [Lists] wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out if the list traffic has dropped lately. I'm
> used to getting a good chunk of mail from this list but it seems to have
>
I don't think you've got any problem with the reception of list mails,
it's just quiet in here. If you're in doubt
W B Hacker wrote:
> Graeme Fowler wrote:
>> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 15:22 -0400, Tom Ray [Lists] wrote:
>>> Compared and it seems the drop in traffic is legit. What I have in my
>>> inbox is what is in the archives. So the answer is that no ones replied
>>> to my previous messages.
>> It's perhaps
W B Hacker wrote:
> Graeme Fowler wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 15:22 -0400, Tom Ray [Lists] wrote:
>>
>>> Compared and it seems the drop in traffic is legit. What I have in my
>>> inbox is what is in the archives. So the answer is that no ones replied
>>> to my previous messages.
>>>
Tom Ray [Lists] wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out if the list traffic has dropped lately. I'm
> used to getting a good chunk of mail from this list but it seems to have
> tapered off a lot in the last few weeks. I opened my mail today and only
> had about 5 or 6 new emails from the list. Three o
Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 15:22 -0400, Tom Ray [Lists] wrote:
>> Compared and it seems the drop in traffic is legit. What I have in my
>> inbox is what is in the archives. So the answer is that no ones replied
>> to my previous messages.
>
> It's perhaps a coincidence, but the
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 15:22 -0400, Tom Ray [Lists] wrote:
> Compared and it seems the drop in traffic is legit. What I have in my
> inbox is what is in the archives. So the answer is that no ones replied
> to my previous messages.
It's perhaps a coincidence, but the drop in list traffic does cor
>> I'm concerned because I submitted some emails about transport and ACL
>> rules/formating for SPAM and haven't seen any replies. I know that could
>> be that no one has replied to it but the drop in the amount of emails I
>> get from this list has me a little worried.
>>
>
> Have you compar
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 at 12:23 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
> I'm trying to figure out if the list traffic has dropped lately. I'm
> used to getting a good chunk of mail from this list but it seems to have
> tapered off a lot in the last few weeks. I opened my mail today and only
> had abo
I'm trying to figure out if the list traffic has dropped lately. I'm
used to getting a good chunk of mail from this list but it seems to have
tapered off a lot in the last few weeks. I opened my mail today and only
had about 5 or 6 new emails from the list. Three or four about the Poor
document
14 matches
Mail list logo
