Ian P. Christian wrote:
> Graeme Fowler wrote:
>>> Is it time to consider alternatives to Exim as my MTA of choice ?
>> Maybe, maybe not ;-)
>
> I cna't help but think "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".
I'd agree. The smtp protocol exists for a while already and how much
could you add feature wi
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:38:02AM +, David Restall - System Administrator
wrote:
> Is it time to consider alternatives to Exim as my MTA of choice ?
> Every sysadmin that uses Exim must be asking themselves this - this
> list and the other lists are not answering the future questions and we
>
David Restall - System Administrator wrote:
>>> A lot of us out here are just ordinary sysadmins trying to keep things
>>> up and running and getting by on a day to day basis and things like
>>> Exim are core to what we do. Most of these things (including Exim)
>>> are stable, well written and sup
On Dec 5, 2007 7:24 PM, Derrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Restall - System Administrator wrote:
>
> > a good decision - I have been running Exim for almost 15 years so am
>
> Is there somewhere a document that shows the past release dates? It's
> interesting you mention
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, David Restall - System Administrator wrote:
> a good decision - I have been running Exim for almost 15 years so am
Is there somewhere a document that shows the past release dates? It's
interesting you mention how long you've been running it, I was trying to
figure that out r
[Resent - managed to send this originally without copying the list]
I am horridly short of time right now (those that know me will realise
the
horror that the word "pantomime" can entail...).
However I do have an exim 4.69 potential release around, which is
basically a
minor bug fix release.
Exim isn't going to just up and leave overnight - that just can't
happen. The domain, mirrors, wiki, and bug list are all still actively
maintained. The code is as solid now as it was when Phil retired and
there have been no major, show stopping bugs presented since 4.68. There
are a few bug fixes
Hi David,
You only have to take a look around this mailing list to realise that Exim
is fiercely loved by those of us who use it. I have every faith in the
developers that Exim will continue to be well maintained and feature rich
going forward.
Personally, I'm not looking to move away from
Hi,
Graeme Fowler :-
> [I can't speak for the developer team, so this is my personal take]
This is what I'm after :-)
> On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 11:38 +, David Restall - System Administrator
> wrote:
> > I noticed Marc Perkel's post a few weeks ago about the ongoing life
> > of Exim and he was
Graeme Fowler wrote:
>> Is it time to consider alternatives to Exim as my MTA of choice ?
>
> Maybe, maybe not ;-)
I cna't help but think "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".
It's working fine, I don't require any new features - it does everything
I currently need - so personally, just because
[I can't speak for the developer team, so this is my personal take]
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 11:38 +, David Restall - System Administrator
wrote:
> I noticed Marc Perkel's post a few weeks ago about the ongoing life
> of Exim and he was swiftly diverted to exim-dev. There isn't much on
> there a
Hi,
I noticed Marc Perkel's post a few weeks ago about the ongoing life
of Exim and he was swiftly diverted to exim-dev. There isn't much on
there about what is happening in the future and what the plans are etc.
I also note that exim-future is under-nourished with messages.
A lot of us out here
12 matches
Mail list logo
