Hi
> Why the numbers instead of normal VERP syntax?
The mailing list server already exists and works the other way (right now
sending every mail distinctly).
The router below only has 4 lines and helps me to keep everything else
unchanged.
> The way you want to transfer data from the recipient a
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Steffen Heil wrote:
>
> verb_router:
> driver = redirect
> condition = ${if match {${lc:$sender_address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> {\N^(.*)-recipient@(.*) (\d*)-(.*)@(.*)$\N} }
> data = ${if match {${lc:$sender_address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> {\N^(.*)-recipient@(.*) (\d*)-(.*)@(.*
Hi
> I guess that's poorly worded. I will try to improve it. It
> doesn't matter how many recipients are in the message you
> send. If you set max_rcpt to 1 on the smtp transport, the
> *outgoing* messages will be sent with only one recipient. In
> other words, it will split up the message for
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Steffen Heil wrote:
> But it says:
> > For this to work, you must also arrange for outgoing messages that have
> "-request" in their return paths to have just a single recipient. That is
> achieved by setting max_rcpt to 1.
>
> So I do need to send every mail distinctly...
>
Hi
> http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.62/doc/html/spec_html/ch46.html#SECTverp
>
> > Now, for every mail to have a distinct envelope sender, I
> need to pass
> > every mail distinctly to the mail server.
>
> Nope.
But it says:
> For this to work, you must also arrange for outgoing messages tha
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006, Steffen Heil wrote:
>
> I want to use exim4 as MTA for my own mailing list manager. However, every
> sent mail should have a distinct envelope sender for easy bounce parsing.
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.62/doc/html/spec_html/ch46.html#SECTverp
> Now, for every mail to hav
Hello
I want to use exim4 as MTA for my own mailing list manager. However, every
sent mail should have a distinct envelope sender for easy bounce parsing.
Now, for every mail to have a distinct envelope sender, I need to pass every
mail distinctly to the mail server. That's one the one side a pro
