Sometime around Sat, 4 Nov 2006 15:17:22 +, it may be that Chris
Lightfoot wrote:
> GNU file(1) recognises PE
> executables OK (though a look at the magic file suggests
> that actually the way they do it would be easy to evade so
> better to write a little program to do it, I think; it's
> prob
Peter Velan wrote:
> am 2006-11-04 14:37 schrieb John Hall:
>> On 11/4/06, Peter Velan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> Will windoze execute a file that ends in dot-space-space-space-exe ?
> dosent the os see this as NOT ending in .exe
I think that windows will happily exec the file, b
Historically Windows has been very enthusiastic about
executing files that you mightn't expect it to. (E.g. you
can create a PE file with a .pif extension which the shell
will execute; and you can switch on the POSIX execute bit
for a file of arbitrary extension and cmd.exe would
execute *that*, or
am 2006-11-04 14:37 schrieb John Hall:
> On 11/4/06, Peter Velan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >> Will windoze execute a file that ends in dot-space-space-space-exe ?
>> >> dosent the os see this as NOT ending in .exe
>> >
>> > I think that windows will happily exec the file, but I don't have a
John Hall wrote:
> On 11/4/06, Peter Velan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Will windoze execute a file that ends in dot-space-space-space-exe ?
dosent the os see this as NOT ending in .exe
>>> I think that windows will happily exec the file, but I don't have a
>>> machine to test on.
>> Yo
On 11/4/06, Peter Velan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Will windoze execute a file that ends in dot-space-space-space-exe ?
> >> dosent the os see this as NOT ending in .exe
> >
> > I think that windows will happily exec the file, but I don't have a
> > machine to test on.
>
> You are right - Wi
On 11/4/06, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Will windoze execute a file that ends in dot-space-space-space-exe ?
> > dosent the os see this as NOT ending in .exe
>
> I think that windows will happily exec the file, but I don't have a
> machine to test on.
Under both Windows XP SP2 an
am 2006-11-04 14:11 schrieb Stephen Gran:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 01:55:22AM +0200, Stuart Gall said:
>> On 3 Nov 2006, at 15:50, Stephen Gran wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:34:15PM +0200, Brent Clark said:
>> >>
>> >> condition = ${if match{$acl_m1}{\N^(
>> > [...]
>> >>
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 01:55:22AM +0200, Stuart Gall said:
> On 3 Nov 2006, at 15:50, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:34:15PM +0200, Brent Clark said:
> >>
> >> condition = ${if match{$acl_m1}{\N^(
> > [...]
> >> )$\N}{1}{0}}
> >
>
On 3 Nov 2006, at 15:50, Stephen Gran wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:34:15PM +0200, Brent Clark said:
>>
>> Hey all
>>
>> I just found a hole / bug in my acl for file extension handling.
>>
>> This is my current ACL
>>
>> # File extension filtering.
>> deny set acl_m1 = ${extract{-1}{.}{${
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Brent Clark wrote:
> From: Brent Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: exim-users@exim.org
> Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:34:15 +0200
> Subject: [exim] caution to those blocking files by extension
>
> I just found a hole / bug in my acl for file extension h
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:34:15PM +0200, Brent Clark said:
>
> Hey all
>
> I just found a hole / bug in my acl for file extension handling.
>
> This is my current ACL
>
> # File extension filtering.
> deny set acl_m1 = ${extract{-1}{.}{${lc:$mime_filename}}}
> message = Disallowed file exte
Hey all
I just found a hole / bug in my acl for file extension handling.
This is my current ACL
# File extension filtering.
deny set acl_m1 = ${extract{-1}{.}{${lc:$mime_filename}}}
message = Disallowed file extension
log_message = REJECTED ATTACHMENT ($acl_m1) (rcpt to: $recipients)
co
13 matches
Mail list logo
