Re: [exim] emails going down under

2006-04-28 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2006-04-27 at 14:00 +0100, John Clement wrote: > Phil Pennock wrote: > > How about if you specify "exim -oMr spam-scanned -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]"? > > > > Changing "spam-scanned" to whichever Received Protocol is actually used > > to bypass the spamcheck Router in the configuration? > > > Does

Re: [exim] emails going down under

2006-04-28 Thread John Clement
Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2006-04-26 at 16:11 +0100, John Clement wrote: > >> How do I go about tracing where his emails are going? At the last place >> I worked if I typed 'exim -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]' it would check through >> the aliases until it found where the mail actually gets delivered

Re: [exim] emails going down under

2006-04-27 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2006-04-26 at 16:11 +0100, John Clement wrote: > How do I go about tracing where his emails are going? At the last place > I worked if I typed 'exim -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]' it would check through > the aliases until it found where the mail actually gets delivered to, > here though it seems th

[exim] emails going down under

2006-04-27 Thread John Clement
I've just moved to a new company, they have a main mail server in the UK and another in Australia, I believe the Aus' server receives emails for the Aus' employees from the main server here in the uk. One of our Aus' employees recently moved here, so they changed the alias file on the Aus serve