On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Jasen Betts wrote:
> From: Jasen Betts
> To: exim-users@exim.org
> Newsgroups: gmane.mail.exim.user
> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:44:37
> Subject: Re: [exim] retry timeout exceeded
>
> On 2014-04-08, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
> > Jasen,
> >
> &
On 2014-04-08, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
> Jasen,
>
> Are you using the community edition, or enterprise of baruwa 2?
no.
--
umop apisdn
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - htt
eremy=fluxlabs@exim.org
[mailto:exim-users-bounces+jeremy=fluxlabs@exim.org] On Behalf Of Jasen
Betts
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 2:21 AM
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] retry timeout exceeded
On 2014-03-31, Jacco van Gent wrote:
>>
>
> I am using Mailscanner togethe
On 2014-03-31, Jacco van Gent wrote:
>>
>
> I am using Mailscanner together with Baruwa 2.0, their setup suggest
>deferring the message, so that Mailscanner can process it and write
>message data to a postgresql database. If I am not mistaken, this is
>the same approach Mailscanner suggests on the
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Jacco van Gent wrote:
> From: Jacco van Gent
> To: Exim-users
> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:08:12
> Subject: Re: [exim] retry timeout exceeded
...
> I am using Mailscanner together with Baruwa 2.0, their setup
> suggest deferring the message, so that Mails
On 2014-03-31 08:05, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> On 31/03/14 07:08, Jacco van Gent wrote:
> > I am using Mailscanner together with Baruwa 2.0, their setup suggest
> > deferring the message, so that Mailscanner can process it and write message
> > data to a postgresql database. If I am not mistaken, th
On 31/03/14 07:08, Jacco van Gent wrote:
I am using Mailscanner together with Baruwa 2.0, their setup suggest deferring
the message, so that Mailscanner can process it and write message data to a
postgresql database. If I am not mistaken, this is the same approach
Mailscanner suggests on their
On 2014-03-30 17:29, Evgeniy Berdnikov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:05:08AM +, Jacco van Gent wrote:
> > I am using exim (4.82) together with mailscanner. Exim is setup to
> > defer messages so that mailscanner can scan the messages. After
> > mailscanner has scanned the message and if t
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:05:08AM +, Jacco van Gent wrote:
> I am using exim (4.82) together with mailscanner. Exim is setup to
> defer messages so that mailscanner can scan the messages. After
> mailscanner has scanned the message and if the message passes as
> clean, mailscanner calls exim t
Hi,
I am using exim (4.82) together with mailscanner. Exim is setup to defer
messages so that mailscanner can scan the messages. After mailscanner has
scanned the message and if the message passes as clean, mailscanner calls exim
to sent the message to the backend smtp server (exchange).
N
On 03/05/2013 02:12 PM, Frank Elsner wrote:
retry timeout exceeded
Is it possible that the destination host has been not-accepting for some time?
(also, what version Exim?)
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http:/
Hallo,
how can this happen that a message immediatly after "please come back later"
gets a timeout as in this case?:
2013-02-21 21:43:28 1U8czG-XP-EG <= sen...@tu-berlin.de
H=autodiscover.tu-berlin.de (exchange.tu-berlin.de) [130.149.7.70] P=esmtps
X=TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128 S=4033116
id=7760
Hi!
I see mails fail to deliver with the message "retry time exceeded" but i
can't really place why the retry time was exceeded in the first place.
I think this has to do with hints databases, but what exactly can be
done to prevent it is unclear.
Scenario:
We have a (mailman) mailinglist with >2
d Fernández
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Bowyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "exim users"
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [exim] Retry timeout exceeded - Connection timed out
On 30/03/07, David Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 30/03/07, David Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, my first message to the list.
> May someone tell me why machine 1 have this strange behaviour?
This is a bit of an obvious answer, but is the retry configuration
different between the 2 machines?
> And (not
> related to Exim), did som
Hi, my first message to the list.
After searching the web for an answer, I write to the list looking for help.
I have two machines, Exim 4.63.
Message for machine 1 to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007-03-29 18:55:59 1HWxnW-0003HD-0d == [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R=lookuphost T=remote_smtp defer (110): Connection
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:48:58AM +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
>
>
> Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I've got a strange behavior of exim:
> >
> >Feb 26 16:27:34 dragon exim[12094]: 2007-02-26 16:27:34 1HLgp2-000394-Tb
> ><= [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=(xxx.ua) [212.40.35.6] P=esmtp S=1536458
Alexander Shikoff wrote:
Hello,
I've got a strange behavior of exim:
Feb 26 16:27:34 dragon exim[12094]: 2007-02-26 16:27:34 1HLgp2-000394-Tb <=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] H=(xxx.ua) [212.40.35.6] P=esmtp S=1536458 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feb 26 16:27:44 dragon exim[12109]: 2007-02-26 16:27:44 1HLgp2-00039
Hello,
I've got a strange behavior of exim:
Feb 26 16:27:34 dragon exim[12094]: 2007-02-26 16:27:34 1HLgp2-000394-Tb <=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] H=(xxx.ua) [212.40.35.6] P=esmtp S=1536458 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feb 26 16:27:44 dragon exim[12109]: 2007-02-26 16:27:44 1HLgp2-000394-Tb SMTP
error from remote
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Jeremy Harris wrote:
Jason Keltz wrote:
How can retry timeout be exceeded?
Exim replied to the original sender with a message
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host x.x.x [#.#.#.#]: 450 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Recipient address
Jason Keltz wrote:
How can retry timeout be exceeded?
Exim replied to the original sender with a message
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host x.x.x [#.#.#.#]: 450 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Recipient address rejected: Greylisted: retry timeout exceed
Hi.
We're running exim 4.52.
One of our users sent a message to a site that is configured with
greylisting, and I'm not sure that I understand the log details:
The message went out:
2006-04-03 15:45:26 1FQUzO-0006Jo-4J <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=([8.9.10.11])
[8.9.10.11] P=esmtpsa X=TLSv1:AES25
Here is my situation.
Using exim 4.34 built from freebsd-ports to do antivirus/antispam scanning (via
MailScanner) and sending all scanned mail to back-end mailhub via smart_route
(manualroute).
Anyway, this all works great when the mailhub that the mail is routed to is up
and working. Howe
23 matches
Mail list logo
