Richard Hobbs wrote:
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Wade
Sent: 20 July 2005 17:25
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config
Richard Hobbs wrote:
Hello,
I have found our latest problem
e some breath :(
TIA,
jonathan
On 7/21/05, Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Wade
> > Sent: 20 July 2005 17:25
> > To: exim-users@
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Wade
> Sent: 20 July 2005 17:25
> To: exim-users@exim.org
> Subject: Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config
>
> Richard Hobbs wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
Richard Hobbs wrote:
Hello,
I have found our latest problem - we have a mail loop! Here's the command
used to send the mail back to exim once it's been checked (I think):
/usr/sbin/exim4 -oMr spam-scanned -bS
And here are the router and transport in full, which I am using:
THE ROUTER:
# spa
---Original Message-
> From: Oliver Egginger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 July 2005 12:48
> To: Richard Hobbs
> Cc: exim-users@exim.org
> Subject: RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config
>
> > I can change the transport all I like, but spamd still runs
> as root.
&
> I can change the transport all I like, but spamd still runs as root.
> Should this be the case?
Yes. Thats necessary for binding to port 783.
> Also, what about the autolearn failure? What can do to get autolearn working
> in spamd?
Dimmish. You don't post an error message which is specific e
m.org
> Subject: RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config
>
> This happens due to the fact that the spamc programm (which
> gets called
> in the sa_spamcheck transport) runs under root rights.
>
> > 2005-07-18 09:50:34 1DuRK
This happens due to the fact that the spamc programm (which gets called
in the sa_spamcheck transport) runs under root rights.
> 2005-07-18 09:50:34 1DuRKc-0005AK-MO User 0 set for sa_spamcheck
Don't run spamc with root rights, for example use "user
Hello,
I now have an almost-working solution with SpamAssassin, but I have one
small problem:
2005-07-18 09:50:34 1DuRKc-0005AK-MO <= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
H=mail19.messagelabs.com [193.109.254.3] P=smtp S=3092
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2005-07-18 09:50:34 1DuRKc-0005AK-MO User 0 set for sa_spamcheck transpo
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Oliver Egginger wrote:
> > Later, we'd expect a bona fide MTA to offer
> > the remaining recipients in a separate transaction, and we'd accept
> > those against *their* preferences profile.
>
> This will drop away mail from one shot setups.
That's part of what I meant by
Nigel Wade wrote:
> Richard Hobbs wrote:
> > - Once exim heavy is running (and exiscan is therefore enabled) I need to
> > setup the ACL stuff to allow exim to run spamassassin, but only if the
> > user's preferences exist.
>
> The problem with running per-user spam checking in an ACL is that you
"Alan J. Flavell" wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Nigel Wade wrote:
>
> > The problem with running per-user spam checking in an ACL is that
> > you need to restrict messages to single recipients.
>
> Fair comment, if you give users a free choice of preferences...
>
> > The only way to avoid this
> Later, we'd expect a bona fide MTA to offer
> the remaining recipients in a separate transaction, and we'd accept
> those against *their* preferences profile.
This will drop away mail from one shot setups. Not any MTA will do a
second transaction. Also mail from t-online and other huge mail
pr
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Nigel Wade wrote:
> The problem with running per-user spam checking in an ACL is that
> you need to restrict messages to single recipients.
Fair comment, if you give users a free choice of preferences...
> The only way to avoid this is to have only one set of preferences,
Richard Hobbs wrote:
Hello,
OK, 'strings /usr/sbin/exim4 | grep spam' produces the following result:
rejected. Refusing MAIL FROM:<> does not help fight spam, disregards
I guess exiscan is included in my exim build by default given the
information mentions previously, but I don't know how to
Marc Sherman wrote:
>> local_parts = /etc/exim/spam_free_users
> This advice is incorrect. local_parts= is not available in the DATA
Yes, of course. Sorry for the thinko...
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please
Richard Hobbs wrote:
I guess exiscan is included in my exim build by default given the
information mentions previously, but I don't know how to find out if
I'm running heavy or light exim...
If you're running debian sarge, apt-get install exim4-daemon-heavy.
- Marc
--
## List details at ht
il: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +44 1223 376964Mobile: +44 7811 803377
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Sherman
> Sent: 11 July 2005 15:08
> To: exim-users@exim.org
Richard Hobbs wrote:
2005-07-11 12:15:47 Exim configuration error in line 130 of
/etc/exim4/exim4.conf:
main option "spamd_address" unknown
Warning! Invalid configuration file for exim4. Exiting.
Richard Hobbs wrote:
> OK, in that case, maybe I do want to go with the exiscan approach... I did
> try this by following Tim Jackson's instructions as best I could, but
> received the following error when I tried to restart exim:
try "strings /usr/sbin/exim | grep spam" and see if spamd-support
Richard Hobbs wrote:
> Some users do not want spam checking to be done at all, but other users
> would like it to be done. The part I'm having trouble with is understanding
> how to get exim to use spamassassin at all, let alone for some accounts and
> not others.
Exim's spec.txt, 40.2 is quite v
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Sherman
> Sent: 11 July 2005 13:03
> To: exim-users@exim.org
> Subject: Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config
>
> Richard Hobbs wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thanks for the info people :-) I tried Tim Jackson's guide, a
Richard Hobbs wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for the info people :-) I tried Tim Jackson's guide, and it
looks great, but the link to the webpage on "dman.ddts.net" no longer
works, and google's cache of it has gone too. Therefore, I think his
approach is not going to help me much. I don't really want to
+44 7811 803377
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Hobbs
> Sent: 11 July 2005 12:51
> To: 'Exim Users'
> Subject: RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the info
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Wade
> Sent: 11 July 2005 10:47
> To: 'Exim Users'
> Subject: Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config
>
> Richard Hobbs wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We have a mail server on which I would like to enable
> spamassassin, but
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 10:47 +0100, Nigel Wade wrote:
> Richard Hobbs wrote:
> > Also, i have already spent hours on Google trying to find a guide or a
> > how-to somewhere, and I can't find anything.
Best bet is Tim Jackson's guide - you can find that and other relevant
content at
http://w
Richard Hobbs wrote:
Hello,
We have a mail server on which I would like to enable spamassassin, but only
for individual users. We're running Exim 4.50 and SpamAssassin 3.0.3 on a
Debian 3.0 box. Mailman 2.1.5 is also running on the machine if it makes a
difference.
Some users do not want spam c
27 matches
Mail list logo