Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-21 Thread Nigel Wade
Richard Hobbs wrote: Hello, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Wade Sent: 20 July 2005 17:25 To: exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config Richard Hobbs wrote: Hello, I have found our latest problem

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-21 Thread Jonathan Gonzalez
e some breath :( TIA, jonathan On 7/21/05, Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Wade > > Sent: 20 July 2005 17:25 > > To: exim-users@

RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-21 Thread Richard Hobbs
Hello, > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Wade > Sent: 20 July 2005 17:25 > To: exim-users@exim.org > Subject: Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config > > Richard Hobbs wrote: > > Hello, > >

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-20 Thread Nigel Wade
Richard Hobbs wrote: Hello, I have found our latest problem - we have a mail loop! Here's the command used to send the mail back to exim once it's been checked (I think): /usr/sbin/exim4 -oMr spam-scanned -bS And here are the router and transport in full, which I am using: THE ROUTER: # spa

RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-20 Thread Richard Hobbs
---Original Message- > From: Oliver Egginger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20 July 2005 12:48 > To: Richard Hobbs > Cc: exim-users@exim.org > Subject: RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config > > > I can change the transport all I like, but spamd still runs > as root. &

RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-20 Thread Oliver Egginger
> I can change the transport all I like, but spamd still runs as root. > Should this be the case? Yes. Thats necessary for binding to port 783. > Also, what about the autolearn failure? What can do to get autolearn working > in spamd? Dimmish. You don't post an error message which is specific e

RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-20 Thread Richard Hobbs
m.org > Subject: RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config > > This happens due to the fact that the spamc programm (which > gets called > in the sa_spamcheck transport) runs under root rights. > > > 2005-07-18 09:50:34 1DuRK

RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-20 Thread Oliver Egginger
This happens due to the fact that the spamc programm (which gets called in the sa_spamcheck transport) runs under root rights. > 2005-07-18 09:50:34 1DuRKc-0005AK-MO User 0 set for sa_spamcheck Don't run spamc with root rights, for example use "user

RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-20 Thread Richard Hobbs
Hello, I now have an almost-working solution with SpamAssassin, but I have one small problem: 2005-07-18 09:50:34 1DuRKc-0005AK-MO <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=mail19.messagelabs.com [193.109.254.3] P=smtp S=3092 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-18 09:50:34 1DuRKc-0005AK-MO User 0 set for sa_spamcheck transpo

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-13 Thread Alan J. Flavell
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Oliver Egginger wrote: > > Later, we'd expect a bona fide MTA to offer > > the remaining recipients in a separate transaction, and we'd accept > > those against *their* preferences profile. > > This will drop away mail from one shot setups. That's part of what I meant by

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-13 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Nigel Wade wrote: > Richard Hobbs wrote: > > - Once exim heavy is running (and exiscan is therefore enabled) I need to > > setup the ACL stuff to allow exim to run spamassassin, but only if the > > user's preferences exist. > > The problem with running per-user spam checking in an ACL is that you

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-13 Thread Ian FREISLICH
"Alan J. Flavell" wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Nigel Wade wrote: > > > The problem with running per-user spam checking in an ACL is that > > you need to restrict messages to single recipients. > > Fair comment, if you give users a free choice of preferences... > > > The only way to avoid this

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-13 Thread Oliver Egginger
> Later, we'd expect a bona fide MTA to offer > the remaining recipients in a separate transaction, and we'd accept > those against *their* preferences profile. This will drop away mail from one shot setups. Not any MTA will do a second transaction. Also mail from t-online and other huge mail pr

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-13 Thread Alan J. Flavell
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Nigel Wade wrote: > The problem with running per-user spam checking in an ACL is that > you need to restrict messages to single recipients. Fair comment, if you give users a free choice of preferences... > The only way to avoid this is to have only one set of preferences,

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-13 Thread Nigel Wade
Richard Hobbs wrote: Hello, OK, 'strings /usr/sbin/exim4 | grep spam' produces the following result: rejected. Refusing MAIL FROM:<> does not help fight spam, disregards I guess exiscan is included in my exim build by default given the information mentions previously, but I don't know how to

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Marc Sherman wrote: >> local_parts = /etc/exim/spam_free_users > This advice is incorrect. local_parts= is not available in the DATA Yes, of course. Sorry for the thinko... -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Marc Sherman
Richard Hobbs wrote: I guess exiscan is included in my exim build by default given the information mentions previously, but I don't know how to find out if I'm running heavy or light exim... If you're running debian sarge, apt-get install exim4-daemon-heavy. - Marc -- ## List details at ht

RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Richard Hobbs
il: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 1223 376964Mobile: +44 7811 803377 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Sherman > Sent: 11 July 2005 15:08 > To: exim-users@exim.org

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Marc Sherman
Richard Hobbs wrote: 2005-07-11 12:15:47 Exim configuration error in line 130 of /etc/exim4/exim4.conf: main option "spamd_address" unknown Warning! Invalid configuration file for exim4. Exiting.

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Richard Hobbs wrote: > OK, in that case, maybe I do want to go with the exiscan approach... I did > try this by following Tim Jackson's instructions as best I could, but > received the following error when I tried to restart exim: try "strings /usr/sbin/exim | grep spam" and see if spamd-support

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Jakob Hirsch
Richard Hobbs wrote: > Some users do not want spam checking to be done at all, but other users > would like it to be done. The part I'm having trouble with is understanding > how to get exim to use spamassassin at all, let alone for some accounts and > not others. Exim's spec.txt, 40.2 is quite v

RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Richard Hobbs
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Sherman > Sent: 11 July 2005 13:03 > To: exim-users@exim.org > Subject: Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config > > Richard Hobbs wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Thanks for the info people :-) I tried Tim Jackson's guide, a

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Marc Sherman
Richard Hobbs wrote: Hello, Thanks for the info people :-) I tried Tim Jackson's guide, and it looks great, but the link to the webpage on "dman.ddts.net" no longer works, and google's cache of it has gone too. Therefore, I think his approach is not going to help me much. I don't really want to

RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Richard Hobbs
+44 7811 803377 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Hobbs > Sent: 11 July 2005 12:51 > To: 'Exim Users' > Subject: RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config > > Hello, > > Thanks for the info

RE: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Richard Hobbs
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Wade > Sent: 11 July 2005 10:47 > To: 'Exim Users' > Subject: Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config > > Richard Hobbs wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We have a mail server on which I would like to enable > spamassassin, but

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 10:47 +0100, Nigel Wade wrote: > Richard Hobbs wrote: > > Also, i have already spent hours on Google trying to find a guide or a > > how-to somewhere, and I can't find anything. Best bet is Tim Jackson's guide - you can find that and other relevant content at http://w

Re: [exim] Per-User SpamAssassin config

2005-07-11 Thread Nigel Wade
Richard Hobbs wrote: Hello, We have a mail server on which I would like to enable spamassassin, but only for individual users. We're running Exim 4.50 and SpamAssassin 3.0.3 on a Debian 3.0 box. Mailman 2.1.5 is also running on the machine if it makes a difference. Some users do not want spam c