RE: [expert] re :telnet-server & mdk 8.1 + other non working bits

2001-10-30 Thread richard.bown
there's confusion got in here somehow !!! the kernel version I'm using is 2.4.8-26mdk I would like to be able to use 2.4.12-3mdk but I cant because so far I hv'nt been able to compile the modules on eithe 2.4.8 or 2.4.12 I can compile the kernls on both with gcc2.96. I need to move to a later

RE: [expert] re: telnet -sever & mdk 8.1 & NON COMPILING MODULES

2001-10-28 Thread richard.bown
I went back a version and installed mdk 8.0 and the telnet server dos'nt function on that either. howver the telnet server does act ok as a client, so the prblem is not a service or xinitd function.. BUT.. I 'm still absolutly screwed with this build. I 'm unable to get the NAT function of ip

RE: [expert] stable kernel version ????????

2001-10-24 Thread richard.bown
Hi all, sorry about the lousy editing here , this web link times out too quick !!! so no time to do anything pretty with it . looks like part of my probs were due to using gcc3. so on the next reinstall its gcc2.96 and which version of egcs ??? Is supermount functional in 2.4.12-3 ?? best reg

RE: [expert] stable kernel version ????????

2001-10-24 Thread richard.bown
thanks David I'll try that when I get home, as both ethernet interfaces are down I cant get in from here to try anything,,,rebooting has no effect and thats all I can get my wife to do on the phone !!! best regards richard -Original Message- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PRO

[expert] stable kernel version ????????

2001-10-24 Thread richard.bown
Hi Experts, What is the last stable 2.4 kernel that supermount, telnet server, and iptables function properly on. I have problems with the distro kernel in 8.1 (2.4.8-26mdk). cant get the telnet server to be seen, cant compile modules, but can compile the kernel, DNAT is giving big probs when us

RE: [expert] iso images

2001-05-21 Thread richard.bown
thanks to all that replied, BTW I had already done a search on the archieves and got no result and did'nt find a readme either. best regards richard

[expert] iso images

2001-05-21 Thread richard.bown
Hi all, put a request in a few days ago and did get a reply, but to be honest after looking for ages for "un-iso", and finding zilch , I think the wee beasty to use for building the file system from an iso image is mkisofs. Can some ne help with the syntax for extracting the file system to extrac

RE: [expert] xinetd

2001-04-25 Thread richard.bown
One of the reasons I asked was that I HAVE already done chmod 0 xinetd.conf and restarted.\I wanted to know whether this was a feature of xinetd or a Mandrake security cludge Now I dont think thats too much to ask IS IT ? Or have I got to strip mandrake off the machine to load Redhat 7 which al

[expert] xinetd

2001-04-24 Thread richard.bown
last week I posted a request for info...no answers so again ! does xinetd read its config file even with the attibutes set to nothing , ie no execute read , or write for either root, group, or user... this it seems to OR have mandrake shadowed the config files as a security measure. xinetd wil

RE: [expert] Question about Nmap scan results

2001-03-21 Thread richard.bown
are you running the ax25 utils ? if you are are look in /usr/sbin you will find listen in there,its the util like tcpdump for momitoring the ports which are kissattached. 73 de richard g8jvm -Original Message- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on behalf of"Wa

RE: [expert] Hamradio

2001-03-13 Thread richard.bown
yes I'm using 7.2 on two machines with the axutils on a 2.2.17 kernel, the axutils are ok on the 2.4.2 kernel so 8.0 should be ok ,but hav'nt tried it yet 73 de richard g8jvm -Original Message- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on behalf of"Leif Lundskov" <[EMA

RE: [expert] telnet & ftp fail

2001-03-13 Thread richard.bown
also , cos I'ver ben caught by this check you have installed the telnet server,,,standard install is client only 73 de richard g8jvm -Original Message- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on behalf of"John Wolford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 12 March 2001 17:14