[expert] 1.3.x Galeon in Mandrake 9.1 - not so good, perhaps?

2003-03-24 Thread Damon Lynch
Are other users having similar problems to me with Galeon? I must confess I'm not too impressed with it - bugs and / or missing features can be worked around, but simple instability i.e. hard crashes are a real pain in the rear end. Missing features including save with session, and a notable bug i

Re: [expert] 1.3.x Galeon in Mandrake 9.1 - not so good, perhaps?

2003-03-24 Thread Jack Coates
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 18:02, Damon Lynch wrote: > Are other users having similar problems to me with Galeon? I must > confess I'm not too impressed with it - bugs and / or missing features > can be worked around, but simple instability i.e. hard crashes are a > real pain in the rear end. Missing f

Re: [expert] 1.3.x Galeon in Mandrake 9.1 - not so good, perhaps?

2003-03-24 Thread Damon Lynch
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 16:34, Jack Coates wrote: > Even though the 1.3.x branch is a development branch, in practice it is > considered stable for every day use." All I can say is that's not been my experience at the office! They should try filling in a long web form and have the browser disappea

Re: [expert] 1.3.x Galeon in Mandrake 9.1 - not so good, perhaps?

2003-03-24 Thread Jack Coates
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 20:50, Damon Lynch wrote: > On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 16:34, Jack Coates wrote: > > > Even though the 1.3.x branch is a development branch, in practice it is > > considered stable for every day use." > > All I can say is that's not been my experience at the office! They > shoul

Re[2]: [expert] 1.3.x Galeon in Mandrake 9.1 - not so good, perhaps?

2003-03-25 Thread Matt Cahill
Monday, March 24, 2003, 11:50:31 PM, you wrote: DL> On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 16:34, Jack Coates wrote: >> Even though the 1.3.x branch is a development branch, in practice it is >> considered stable for every day use." DL> All I can say is that's not been my experience at the office! They DL> sho