Re: [expert] 2.2.17 kernel on Mandrake 7.0--safe?

2000-07-04 Thread Eric MC DECLERCK
I use the 15-1 without pbs. 17-x cause pbs. Civileme wrote: > > "Bruce E. Harris" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have never upgraded a kernel using a RPM, always used soruce in the past. But > > I wonder if Mandrake does something special to the kernel to make a Mandrake > > specific RPM kernel wo

RE: [expert] 2.2.17 kernel on Mandrake 7.0--safe?

2000-07-04 Thread Russell \"Elik\" Rademacher
uly 04, 2000 5:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [expert] 2.2.17 kernel on Mandrake 7.0--safe? > > > "Bruce E. Harris" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have never upgraded a kernel using a RPM, always used soruce > in the past. But > >

Re: [expert] 2.2.17 kernel on Mandrake 7.0--safe?

2000-07-04 Thread Civileme
"Bruce E. Harris" wrote: > > Hi, > > I have never upgraded a kernel using a RPM, always used soruce in the past. But > I wonder if Mandrake does something special to the kernel to make a Mandrake > specific RPM kernel worth it? In light of this, is the RPM under cooker 2.2.17 > a safe bet for Ma

[expert] 2.2.17 kernel on Mandrake 7.0--safe?

2000-07-04 Thread Bruce E. Harris
Hi, I have never upgraded a kernel using a RPM, always used soruce in the past. But I wonder if Mandrake does something special to the kernel to make a Mandrake specific RPM kernel worth it? In light of this, is the RPM under cooker 2.2.17 a safe bet for Mandrake 7.0? I now have two reasons to up