Enterprise (OV-101) is currently owned by the Smithsonian -- you can see
more information on it and the other orbiters at
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/resources/orbiters/orbiters.html .
Michael
At 02:14 AM 2/11/2003 +0800, you wrote:
>good thing it never made it into space...
>
>If it foll
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Rankin
Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2003 1:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] A moment of Silence. Columbia, NOT Challanger.
Yep, it was enterprise.
"Matthew O. Persico" wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 22:07:40 -0600, David Ranki
Bertin, PLLC
> >510 Ochiltree Street
> >Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
> >(936) 715-9333
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Franki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 9:23 PM
&
order.
rgds
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Rankin
Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] A moment of Silence. Columbia, NOT Challanger.
Trivia:
OV-98 (Drop test vehicle - never fl
f Of David Rankin
Sent: Friday, 7 February 2003 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] A moment of Silence. Columbia, NOT Challanger.
Trivia:
OV-98 (Drop test vehicle - never flown aside from glide tests pre STS-1)
OV-99 Challenger
OV-102 Columbia
OV-103 Discovery
OV-104 Atlantis
OV-10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 9:23 PM
>Subject: RE: [expert] A moment of Silence. Columbia, NOT Challanger.
>
>
>>Ok, I will go along with that, except to say that its the
>>"Columbia" we
>>should
Message -
From: "Franki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 9:23 PM
Subject: RE: [expert] A moment of Silence. Columbia, NOT Challanger.
> Ok, I will go along with that, except to say that its the "Columbia" we
>
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 19:36, James Sparenberg wrote:
> No I was sitting when I typed this so I sat corrected
Oh, OK. I crouch corrected.
-Mark
>
> James
>
>
> On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 16:04, Mark Belanger wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 17:42, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > I sit correc
No I was sitting when I typed this so I sat corrected
James
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 16:04, Mark Belanger wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 17:42, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > I sit corrected and shouldn't type at 6am...I apologize.
>
> Actually, you "stand" corrected.
>
> Maybe you shouldn't
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 17:42, James Sparenberg wrote:
> I sit corrected and shouldn't type at 6am...I apologize.
Actually, you "stand" corrected.
Maybe you shouldn't type at 6pm either :)
-Mark
>
> On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 19:23, Franki wrote:
> > Ok, I will go along with that, except to say that
I sit corrected and shouldn't type at 6am...I apologize.
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 19:23, Franki wrote:
> Ok, I will go along with that, except to say that its the "Columbia" we
> should be remembering..
>
> Challanger happened 17 years ago.
>
> rgds
>
> Frank
>
> -Original Message-
> From
Ok, I will go along with that, except to say that its the "Columbia" we
should be remembering..
Challanger happened 17 years ago.
rgds
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Sparenberg
Sent: Sunday, 2 February 2003 6:55 AM
To: Exper
12 matches
Mail list logo
