Re: [expert] Attachment [was: test message]

2002-05-16 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 07:58 +0300, Jarmo Kettunen wrote: On Thursday 16 May 2002 05:20, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: yup! they shouldn't be klinging-on to the messages any more. What do you mean? The attachment is still there. wobo What attachment? I haven't see any attachments in

Re: [expert] Attachment [was: test message]

2002-05-16 Thread Jarmo Kettunen
On Thursday 16 May 2002 11:31, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: This one: Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Ok.. I see that as you wrote it...Not as attachment..Kmail. Jarmo Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to

Re: [expert] Attachment [was: test message]

2002-05-16 Thread Ken Thompson
On Wednesday 15 May 2002 10:58 pm, Jarmo Kettunen wrote: On Thursday 16 May 2002 05:20, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: yup! they shouldn't be klinging-on to the messages any more. What do you mean? The attachment is still there. wobo What attachment? I haven't see any attachments in those

Re: [expert] Attachment [was: test message]

2002-05-16 Thread James
Sylpheed shows it as a footer attachment as well. James On Thu, 16 May 2002 09:37:22 -0600 Ken Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 15 May 2002 10:58 pm, Jarmo Kettunen wrote: On Thursday 16 May 2002 05:20, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: yup! they shouldn't be klinging-on to the

Re: [expert] Attachment [was: test message]

2002-05-15 Thread daRcmaTTeR
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:23 -0400, daRcmaTTeR wrote: On Mon, 13 May 2002, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: What's this attachment of your mail? Looks like ist went through a StarOffice or Outlook wringer, look at the '^M' signs at the end of

Re: [expert] Attachment [was: test message]

2002-05-15 Thread daRcmaTTeR
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:23 -0400, daRcmaTTeR wrote: On Mon, 13 May 2002, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: What's this attachment of your mail? Looks like ist went through a StarOffice or Outlook wringer, look at the '^M' signs at the end of

Re: [expert] Attachment [was: test message]

2002-05-15 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 22:59 -0400, daRcmaTTeR wrote: On Tue, 14 May 2002, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:23 -0400, daRcmaTTeR wrote: On Mon, 13 May 2002, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: What's this attachment of your mail? Looks like ist went through a StarOffice

Re: [expert] Attachment [was: test message]

2002-05-15 Thread daRcmaTTeR
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: yup! they shouldn't be klinging-on to the messages any more. What do you mean? The attachment is still there. wobo I don't see them anywhere. they're gone on this end. -- daRcmaTTeR -- Registered Linux User #186492 Want

Re: [expert] Attachment [was: test message]

2002-05-15 Thread Jarmo Kettunen
On Thursday 16 May 2002 05:20, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: yup! they shouldn't be klinging-on to the messages any more. What do you mean? The attachment is still there. wobo What attachment? I haven't see any attachments in those messages Jarmo. Want to buy your Pack or Services from

[expert] Attachment [was: test message]

2002-05-13 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:23 -0400, daRcmaTTeR wrote: On Mon, 13 May 2002, Wolfgang Bornath wrote: What's this attachment of your mail? Looks like ist went through a StarOffice or Outlook wringer, look at the '^M' signs at the end of the first 2 lines. I don't know...I haven't