To Mandrake Management:
Yes, I agree, this inundation is not necessary, and is an impediment to the
rendering of effective support. There is a damn good reason to have a separation
between the levels of expertise in Linux experience. Mandrake management, please
take a look, and straighten out thi
On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 09:34:22AM -0700, Russ Johnson wrote:
-> Yup, seems to me there was a reason I was required to read EVERY message in the
-> forums I did support in
->
-> Also seems to me that mandrake isn't doing this, but should be.
->
-> Russ
->
-> Charles Curley wrote:
->
-> > O
Yup, seems to me there was a reason I was required to read EVERY message in the
forums I did support in
Also seems to me that mandrake isn't doing this, but should be.
Russ
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 12:11:21AM -0400, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote:
> ->
> -> I don't kn
On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 12:11:21AM -0400, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote:
->
-> I don't know what the deal is, but I'm getting inudated with messges
-> from *all* the Mandrake lists (devel, newbie, cookier, expert) even
-> though I'm only subscribed to a couple.
->
-> This situation is intolerabl
Well, I'll be sorry to see you go Brian. You've offered some really
good advise on this list. Take care, Mike
"Brian T. Schellenberger" wrote:
>
> I don't know what the deal is, but I'm getting inudated with messges
> from *all* the Mandrake lists (devel, newbie, cookier, expert) even
> though
I don't know what the deal is, but I'm getting inudated with messges
from *all* the Mandrake lists (devel, newbie, cookier, expert) even
though I'm only subscribed to a couple.
This situation is intolerable, so I'm off of the list.
If Mandrake gets the lists problems fixed, maybe some individua
