-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wanted us to know:
No hardware RAID (on i586 architechture) supports this to my knowledge,
but then it was attested that linux software raid was always better
anyway:)
When it comes to data recovery, definitely not.
No hardware RAID
On Friday 31 October 2003 10:18 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 16:21, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2003 07:21 pm, Michael Adams wrote:
No hardware RAID (on i586 architechture) supports this to my knowledge,
but then it was attested that linux software raid was
On Saturday 01 November 2003 12:52 am, Jack Coates wrote:
Yeah, I always wondered about the Inexpensive part when it's typically
used with $1000 SCSI drives :-) Makes more sense if it was intended for
IDE at first.
I think that it always was in relation to the cost of losing the data. eg,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
I'm planning to try RAID-1 or RAID-5. Does anyone have any experience on this?
Can you pls tell me about it or give me an url?
Thanks guys.
- --
Fajar http://linux.arinet.org
Linux mdk91.sistek.kom 2.4.21-0.13mdk GNU/Linux
15:31:15 up
On Friday 31 October 2003 03:33 am, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Dear all,
I'm planning to try RAID-1 or RAID-5. Does anyone have any experience on
this? Can you pls tell me about it or give me an url?
Thanks guys.
I use RAID 1 here on a small samba server. Very easy to set up and get
going.
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 06:52:29 -0500
Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2003 03:33 am, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Dear all,
I'm planning to try RAID-1 or RAID-5. Does anyone have any
experience on this? Can you pls tell me about it or give me an url?
Thanks guys.
I use
On Friday 31 October 2003 07:21 pm, Michael Adams wrote:
No hardware RAID (on i586 architechture) supports this to my knowledge,
but then it was attested that linux software raid was always better
anyway:)
No hardware RAID with IDE type devices. SCSI is very well supported because
it does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 01 November 2003 07:21 am, Michael Adams wrote:
No hardware RAID (on i586 architechture) supports this to my knowledge,
but then it was attested that linux software raid was always better
anyway:)
Hi Michael,
Can you show me how to do
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 16:21, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2003 07:21 pm, Michael Adams wrote:
No hardware RAID (on i586 architechture) supports this to my knowledge,
but then it was attested that linux software raid was always better
anyway:)
No hardware RAID with IDE type
On Friday 31 October 2003 07:44 pm, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Saturday 01 November 2003 07:21 am, Michael Adams wrote:
No hardware RAID (on i586 architechture) supports this to my knowledge,
but then it was attested that linux software raid was always better
anyway:)
Hi Michael,
Can you
On Friday 31 October 2003 10:42 pm, Salane KIng wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2003 07:44 pm, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Saturday 01 November 2003 07:21 am, Michael Adams wrote:
No hardware RAID (on i586 architechture) supports this to my knowledge,
but then it was attested that linux software
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 19:18, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 16:21, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2003 07:21 pm, Michael Adams wrote:
No hardware RAID (on i586 architechture) supports this to my knowledge,
but then it was attested that linux software raid was always
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 21:52:52 -0800
Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Yeah, I always wondered about the Inexpensive part when it's typically
used with $1000 SCSI drives :-) Makes more sense if it was intended
for IDE at first.
Originally (as per the Berkeley geekz), RAID stood for
13 matches
Mail list logo
