Are we going to be getting kernel updates for the local root problem?
Or the new problem with glibc?
It's been days now :P
--
Bryan Whitehead
SysAdmin - JPL - Interferometry Systems and Technology
Phone: 818 354 2903
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go
This time Bryan Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> Are we going to be getting kernel updates for the local root
> problem?
Vincent and the kernel dudes are working on this...some time next
week you'll get them. Meanwhile you can do, as root:
echo "/path/to/non-exist
Vox wrote:
This time Bryan Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
Are we going to be getting kernel updates for the local root
problem?
Vincent and the kernel dudes are working on this...some time next
week you'll get them. Meanwhile you can do, as root:
echo "/path/to/no
Vox wrote:
This time Bryan Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
Are we going to be getting kernel updates for the local root
problem?
Vincent and the kernel dudes are working on this...some time next
week you'll get them. Meanwhile you can do, as root:
echo "/path/to/no
This time Bryan Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> Vox wrote:
>> This time Bryan Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> becomes daring and
>> writes:
>>
>>>Are we going to be getting kernel updates for the local root
>>>problem?
>> Vincent and the kernel dudes are working on thi
[snip]
Uhm...from what I read there it's a portmap/RPC problem...good thing
I don't run portmap anywhere :)
It is a RPC library problem in glibc. This is just an example of the
impact. named uses RPC stuff extensivly also... so if you run a DNS you
might want to worry a bit.
Combo remote exp
On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 03:35:36PM -0800, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> Are we going to be getting kernel updates for the local root problem?
>
> Or the new problem with glibc?
>
> It's been days now :P
Let's see... I could have been really quick and put them out the day I built
them without any
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 21:44, Vincent Danen wrote:
...
> Let's see... I could have been really quick and put them out the day I built
> them without any testing... would that have been fast enough for you?
...
The beatings will continue until morale improves!
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scient
On Fri Mar 21, 2003 at 09:56:11PM -0800, Jack Coates wrote:
> ...
> > Let's see... I could have been really quick and put them out the day I built
> > them without any testing... would that have been fast enough for you?
> ...
>
> The beatings will continue until morale improves!
Yes... I like b
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 17:02, Vox wrote:
> This time Bryan Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> becomes daring and writes:
>
> > Vox wrote:
> >> This time Bryan Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> becomes daring and
> >> writes:
> >>
> >>>Are we going to be getting kernel updates for the local root
> >>>prob
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 21:56, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 21:44, Vincent Danen wrote:
> ...
> > Let's see... I could have been really quick and put them out the day I built
> > them without any testing... would that have been fast enough for you?
> ...
>
> The beatings will continue
Am Samstag, 22. März 2003 01:38 schrieb Vox:
> This time Bryan Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> becomes daring and writes:
> > Are we going to be getting kernel updates for the local root
> > problem?
>
> Vincent and the kernel dudes are working on this...some time next
> week you'll get them.
This time Martin Fahrendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> Am Samstag, 22. März 2003 01:38 schrieb Vox:
>> This time Bryan Whitehead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> becomes daring and writes:
>> > Are we going to be getting kernel updates for the local root
>> > problem?
>>
>> Vinc
13 matches
Mail list logo
