This time Ken Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> On Monday 13 January 2003 07:25 pm, Damian Gatabria wrote:
>> > ==
>> > [ken@spooky ken]$ licq
>> > 20:43:59: [WRN] Licq: Ignoring stale lockfile (pid 5754)
>> > fcntl: Bad file descri
FWIW, LICQ does work if I am root, su, or kdesu. Just refuses to work as
normal user. I have even shut msec clear off with no change..
Sure would like to solve the puzzle.. More info that I just thought of: My
buddy's system is using the CheapBytes CD's and this one is loaded from
Edmunds Enterp
On Monday 13 January 2003 07:25 pm, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> > ==
> > [ken@spooky ken]$ licq
> > 20:43:59: [WRN] Licq: Ignoring stale lockfile (pid 5754)
> > fcntl: Bad file descriptor
> > fcntl: Bad file descriptor
> > fcntl: Bad file descriptor
> > fcntl: B
> ==
> [ken@spooky ken]$ licq
> 20:43:59: [WRN] Licq: Ignoring stale lockfile (pid 5754)
> fcntl: Bad file descriptor
> fcntl: Bad file descriptor
> fcntl: Bad file descriptor
> fcntl: Bad file descriptor
> fcntl: Bad file descriptor
> fcntl: Bad file descri
On Monday 13 January 2003 04:34 pm, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 January 2003 01:41, Ken Thompson wrote:
> > The subject sez it all. Both 9.0 and 9.1b1 will not let LICQ or LICQ(kde)
> > load and run.. Different systems entirely, funny thing is, it works on my
> > buddy's system with no t
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 01:41, Ken Thompson wrote:
> The subject sez it all. Both 9.0 and 9.1b1 will not let LICQ or LICQ(kde)
> load and run.. Different systems entirely, funny thing is, it works on my
> buddy's system with no trouble.
> Also, it works on my Pentium II 400. It worked OK from 8.
The subject sez it all. Both 9.0 and 9.1b1 will not let LICQ or LICQ(kde) load
and run.. Different systems entirely, funny thing is, it works on my buddy's
system with no trouble.
Also, it works on my Pentium II 400. It worked OK from 8.0 up untill 9.0 too.
Hmm, VIA chipsets again
If any
