What would I need to setup two Apache servers to serve the same domain
name using load balancing & round robin? Each user session must be
limited to one server. And it must be able to sense when one of the
servers are down and skip over that server to a working server.
Want to buy your Pack
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 12:17, Sevatio wrote:
> What would I need to setup two Apache servers to serve the same domain
> name using load balancing & round robin? Each user session must be
> limited to one server. And it must be able to sense when one of the
> servers are down and skip over that
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 12:33, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 12:17, Sevatio wrote:
> > What would I need to setup two Apache servers to serve the same domain
> > name using load balancing & round robin? Each user session must be
> > limited to one server. And it must be able to sense
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sevatio wanted us to know:
>What would I need to setup two Apache servers to serve the same domain
>name using load balancing & round robin? Each user session must be
>limited to one server. And it must be able to sense when one of the
>servers a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 12:33, Jack Coates wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 12:17, Sevatio wrote:
> > > What would I need to setup two Apache servers to serve the same domain
> > > name using load balancing & round robin? Each user session must be
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Sevatio wanted us to know:
> >What would I need to setup two Apache servers to serve the same domain
> >name using load balancing & round robin? Each user session must be
> >limited to one server. And it must be able to sense when one of the
> >se
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 03:32, Mark Watts wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 12:33, Jack Coates wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 12:17, Sevatio wrote:
> > > > What would I need to setup two Apache servers to serve the same domain
> > > > name us
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 07:30, Mark Watts wrote:
> ...> >
> > > If you use ldirectord with heartbeat to control the load balancing, you
> > > just need to set persistent=120 (in the ldirectord.conf) to have a 2
> > > minute persistancy window.
> > >
> > > Mark.
> >
> > That's fine if you're load-bala
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 03:32, Mark Watts wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 12:33, Jack Coates wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 12:17, Sevatio wrote:
> > > > > What would I need to setup t
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 08:02, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 07:30, Mark Watts wrote:
> > ...> >
> > > > If you use ldirectord with heartbeat to control the load balancing, you
> > > > just need to set persistent=120 (in the ldirectord.conf) to have a 2
> > > > minute persistancy window.
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 11:51, James Sparenberg wrote:
...
> > > What does cookie persistance do that LVS persistance doesn't?
> >
> > LVS == map persistence by the SIP:SP > DIP:DP quad. So 10.1.1.1:30800 >
> > 10.2.2.2:80 goes to A, but 10.1.1.2:1024 > 10.2.2.2:80 goes to B. If
> > 10.1.1.1 is a sq
11 matches
Mail list logo
