Marcos Dione wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> > I guess you are referring to the new mdk7 for 486 (needed
> > because v.7.0x is for 586 or up). Charles was asking about v.6.1
> > working on a 486.
> > Yes, Charles, I installed a 6.1 on a 486/40MHz w/ 64M of ram. It
> > wor
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> I guess you are referring to the new mdk7 for 486 (needed
> because v.7.0x is for 586 or up). Charles was asking about v.6.1
> working on a 486.
> Yes, Charles, I installed a 6.1 on a 486/40MHz w/ 64M of ram. It
> works nice although I don't use X on
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 16:33 -0300, Marcos Dione wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Charles Curley wrote:
>
> > Is there a Mandrake 6.1 for 486? Or can I use the version I have? I
> > thought 6.1 was 586 & up, but I see, RTFMing, that the box says 486 & up.
>
> yes, there is one. search in www.
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Charles Curley wrote:
> Is there a Mandrake 6.1 for 486? Or can I use the version I have? I
> thought 6.1 was 586 & up, but I see, RTFMing, that the box says 486 & up.
yes, there is one. search in www.linux-mandrake.com. I've
downloaded it already, but I have not test
Is there a Mandrake 6.1 for 486? Or can I use the version I have? I
thought 6.1 was 586 & up, but I see, RTFMing, that the box says 486 & up.
--
-- C^2
No windows were crashed in the making of this email.
Looking for fine software and/or web pages?
http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley
