RE: [expert] NAT x SNAT

2002-05-07 Thread Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas
>Maybe you also need additional rule to permit the VNC ports. >Regards.- > >-Original Message- >From: Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:57 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [expert] NAT x SNAT > >

RE: [expert] NAT x SNAT

2002-05-07 Thread Mendez Martin
Title: RE: [expert] NAT x SNAT Maybe you also need additional rule to permit the VNC ports. Regards.- -Original Message- From: Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [expert] NAT x SNAT Hi

[expert] NAT x SNAT

2002-04-29 Thread Ricardo Castanho de O. Freitas
Hi, I'm using VNC but, I can't get it 'MASQUERADE'. Can anybody help me on this iptables rules? I'm using this one: #iptables -t nat POSTROUTING -o eth1 192.168.0.0/24 -j SNAT --to my_IP(static) comp1: (linux only) eth0:ADSL (my_IP) static eth1:192.168.0.2 comp2: (windows only) eth0:192.168.0