Hi Dan,
Does NT 4.0 (Patch 6) reads FAT32 partitons? Or just FAT16?
On a double boot system with Linux, FAT16 would be the only common nominator
then...(If Win2K is not an option...)
Viktor
with win2k you get to choose whether to use ntfs or fat32.
linux can work with either.
tom
Daniel Woods wrote:
Tom Eastman wrote:
I'm about to install Windows 2000 on my computer, I know that linux could
read Windows NT NTFS partitions just fine, but can it read Windows 2000 NTFS?
with win2k you get to choose whether to use ntfs or fat32.
linux can work with either.
There is a freely avalailable FAT32 reader for NT, but there is no way
to get NT (even sp6a) to write to NTFS. There is also a read-only NTFS
reader for win98 (and one for dos which works in win95).
These are available at http://www.sysinternals.com/
http://www.sysinternals.com/ntfs98.htm
I'm about to install Windows 2000 on my computer, I know that linux could
read Windows NT NTFS partitions just fine, but can it read Windows 2000 NTFS?
Thanks
Tom
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
with win2k you get to choose whether to use ntfs or fat32.
linux can work with either.
tom berkley
Tom Eastman wrote:
I'm about to install Windows 2000 on my computer, I know that linux could
read Windows NT NTFS partitions just fine, but can it read Windows 2000 NTFS?
Thanks
Tom Eastman wrote:
I'm about to install Windows 2000 on my computer, I know that linux could
read Windows NT NTFS partitions just fine, but can it read Windows 2000 NTFS?
with win2k you get to choose whether to use ntfs or fat32.
linux can work with either.
tom berkley
As far as I