Re: [expert] RAM detection problem

2000-06-18 Thread Brian T. Schellenberger
Yes, but why would it have worked in the previous version of Mandrake? That's the mystery here . . . Pj wrote: Windows users frequently get a shock when they switch systems and find their Windows friendly RAM isn't being correctly recognized in Linux. The problem can be as simple as

[expert] RAM detection problem

2000-06-11 Thread Joo Hyun Song
Hi, I just installed Mandrake 7.1 and there seems to be a problem. When I used Mandrake 7.0 with kernel 2.2.14, the system was reported to have 128MB RAM and 598.06 Bogomips Total (which is correct). Now, with 7.1 with kernel 2.2.15, I get 64MB RAM and 1196.03 Bogomips Total reported. The same

Re: [expert] RAM detection problem

2000-06-11 Thread John Aldrich
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, you wrote: Hi, I just installed Mandrake 7.1 and there seems to be a problem. When I used Mandrake 7.0 with kernel 2.2.14, the system was reported to have 128MB RAM and 598.06 Bogomips Total (which is correct). Now, with 7.1 with kernel 2.2.15, I get 64MB RAM and 1196.03

Re: [expert] RAM detection problem

2000-06-11 Thread Pj
Windows users frequently get a shock when they switch systems and find their Windows friendly RAM isn't being correctly recognized in Linux. The problem can be as simple as mismatched pairs. 32MB of FP and 32MB of EDO may equal 64RAM in Windows but Linux will only recognize 32. My two cents..