I think this night it has comming to be loaded on the servers, look at :
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/mandrake/Mandrake-iso/i586/
with the first cd avalaible.
On other serves the rc1 isos have dessapeared:
ftp://ftp.rediris.es/pub/linux/distributions/mandrake-iso/i586
--
F
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 12:44, Francisco wrote:
> I think this night it has comming to be loaded on the servers, look at :
>
> http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/mandrake/Mandrake-iso/i586/
>
Wooo H one down 2 to go!. Now to backup my settings and get
ready for a re-install!
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 15:31, James Sparenberg wrote:
> Wooo H one down 2 to go!. Now to backup my settings and get
> ready for a re-install!
Question: how come rsync is not more popular? It seems like a wonderful
protocol to me, but it seems to get little publicity among non-experts.
Do
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 18:58, Damon Lynch wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 15:31, James Sparenberg wrote:
>
> > Wooo H one down 2 to go!. Now to backup my settings and get
> > ready for a re-install!
>
> Question: how come rsync is not more popular? It seems like a wonderful
> protocol to m
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 16:07, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 18:58, Damon Lynch wrote:
>
> > Question: how come rsync is not more popular? It seems like a wonderful
> > protocol to me, but it seems to get little publicity among non-experts.
> > Does it need a special graphical t
On Monday 03 March 2003 22:22, Damon Lynch wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 16:07, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 18:58, Damon Lynch wrote:
> > > Question: how come rsync is not more popular? It seems like a
> > > wonderful protocol to me, but it seems to get little publicity amon
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 16:44, Salane King wrote:
> Here is a great trick for rsync. update the name of the old iso files to the
> new name then use rsync to update it. it cuts the download time by about 50%
Yes that's what I do also, ever since I read about it on
pclinuxonline.com
I also backup
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 19:44, Salane King wrote:
> On Monday 03 March 2003 22:22, Damon Lynch wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 16:07, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 18:58, Damon Lynch wrote:
> > > > Question: how come rsync is not more popular? It seems like a
> > > > wonderful
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 19:22, Damon Lynch wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 16:07, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 18:58, Damon Lynch wrote:
> >
> > > Question: how come rsync is not more popular? It seems like a wonderful
> > > protocol to me, but it seems to get little publicity
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Damon Lynch wrote on Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:58:26PM +1300 :
>
> Question: how come rsync is not more popular? It seems like a wonderful
> protocol to me, but it seems to get little publicity among non-experts.
> Does it need a special graphical too
On Monday 03 March 2003 10:44 pm, Salane King wrote:
> On Monday 03 March 2003 22:22, Damon Lynch wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 16:07, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 18:58, Damon Lynch wrote:
> > > > Question: how come rsync is not more popular? It seems like a
> > > > wond
11 matches
Mail list logo