OS: Mandrake 9.0
I'm not sure if this is possible but I'll see if any of you guys know
how to do this.
I have a cable modem connected to a hub. Then two linux boxes connected
to that hub. They each have their own IP addresses. When I transfer
files from one to the other, the speed is limite
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 11:35 pm, Sevatio wrote:
> OS: Mandrake 9.0
>
> I'm not sure if this is possible but I'll see if any of you guys know
> how to do this.
>
> I have a cable modem connected to a hub. Then two linux boxes connected
> to that hub. They each have their own IP addresses. When
On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 20:35:06 -0800 Sevatio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OS: Mandrake 9.0
>
> I'm not sure if this is possible but I'll see if any of you guys know
> how to do this.
>
> I have a cable modem connected to a hub. Then two linux boxes connected
>
> to that hub. They each have the
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 23:41:52 -0500 Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 March 2003 11:35 pm, Sevatio wrote:
> > OS: Mandrake 9.0
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is possible but I'll see if any of you guys know
> > how to do this.
> >
> > I have a cable modem connected to a hub. Then
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 11:35 pm, Sevatio wrote:
OS: Mandrake 9.0
I'm not sure if this is possible but I'll see if any of you guys know
how to do this.
I have a cable modem connected to a hub. Then two linux boxes connected
to that hub. They each have their own IP addresses.
Pierre Fortin wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 20:35:06 -0800 Sevatio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OS: Mandrake 9.0
I'm not sure if this is possible but I'll see if any of you guys know
how to do this.
I have a cable modem connected to a hub. Then two linux boxes connected
to that hub. They each ha
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 01:13, Sevatio wrote:
> Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 20:35:06 -0800 Sevatio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>OS: Mandrake 9.0
> >>
> >>I'm not sure if this is possible but I'll see if any of you guys know
> >>how to do this.
> >>
> >>I have a cable mod
On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 21:13:47 -0800 Sevatio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 20:35:06 -0800 Sevatio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>OS: Mandrake 9.0
> >>
> >>I'm not sure if this is possible but I'll see if any of you guys know
> >>how to do this.
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 08:55, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> OK... let's try again... for a start, can you give the output of "route
> -n" for each host?
>
> Somehow, I've always believed what a system tells me over what a user
> tells me... :)
I back this one, at least regarding to system config :-)
--
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 08:55, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> OK... let's try again... for a start, can you give the output of "route
> -n" for each host?
>
Or the output of "ifconfig eth0" for each box.
--
__
/ \\ @ __ __@ Adolfo Bello <[EMAIL PROT
On 05 Mar 2003 09:50:02 -0400 Adolfo Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 08:55, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > OK... let's try again... for a start, can you give the output of
> > "route-n" for each host?
> >
>
> Or the output of "ifconfig eth0" for each box.
^^
I'm looking for
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 10:02, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> On 05 Mar 2003 09:50:02 -0400 Adolfo Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 08:55, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > > OK... let's try again... for a start, can you give the output of
> > > "route-n" for each host?
> > >
> >
> > O
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 10:02, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> On 05 Mar 2003 09:50:02 -0400 Adolfo Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 08:55, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > > OK... let's try again... for a start, can you give the output of
> > > "route-n" for each host?
> > >
> >
> > O
On 05 Mar 2003 10:46:39 -0400 Adolfo Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 10:02, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > On 05 Mar 2003 09:50:02 -0400 Adolfo Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 08:55, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > > > OK... let's try again... for
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 11:48, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> Here's a concrete example to illustrate my point -- NO changes were made
> which would be visible to ifconfig output... feel free to try it
> yourself...
>
> Here, routing is direct between the hosts...
> # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
>
On 05 Mar 2003 12:22:51 -0400 Adolfo Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 11:48, Pierre Fortin wrote:
>
> > Here's a concrete example to illustrate my point -- NO changes were
> > made which would be visible to ifconfig output... feel free to try it
> > yourself...
> >
> > H
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 13:45, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> But the route table might have a host route added... you're right that
> no-one would deliberately delete their subnet route; but adding a host
> route would give the same net result... I used the phrase "positively
> confirm" -- the answer is
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 13:45, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> But the route table might have a host route added... you're right that
> no-one would deliberately delete their subnet route; but adding a host
> route would give the same net result... I used the phrase "positively
> confirm" -- the answer is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adolfo Bello wrote on Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:55:29PM -0400 :
>
> I should say that I never expected the kind of problem that you pointed
> out: somebody deleting his/her own subnet from the routing table.
> Definitely, I learned something today.
In
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 17:00:36 -0800 Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Adolfo Bello wrote on Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:55:29PM -0400 :
> >
> > I should say that I never expected the kind of problem that you
> > pointed out: somebody deleting h
20 matches
Mail list logo
