J. Craig Woods said onto me:
snip
Well the truth be known, you probably did smoke to much grass. But as
long as you did not hang out with Owsley, you should be ok...
snip
Just going through my old mail... Who's Owsley?
--
PROTECTED]
|Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:38 AM
|Subject: Re: OLD [expert] Smoking Grass
|
|
|
|
| J. Craig Woods said onto me:
|
| snip
| Well the truth be known, you probably did smoke to much grass. But as
| long as you did not hang out with Owsley
On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 21:35, civileme wrote:
Brian Parish wrote:
On my system I get:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.68 seconds = 38.10 MB/sec
Is this good, bad, or average?
That is great for UDMA100... in fact the best I have seen.
dpt_i2o, 256MB cache, 64-bit PCI
(8)
On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 20:56, Brian Parish wrote:
On my system I get:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.68 seconds = 38.10 MB/sec
Is this good, bad, or average?
cheers
Brian
Since we are all sharing
[root@tamriel elx]# hdparm -Tt /dev/hdg
/dev/hdg:
Timing buffer-cache
On Thursday 21 March 2002 03:26 pm, you wrote:
On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 20:56, Brian Parish wrote:
On my system I get:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.68 seconds = 38.10 MB/sec
Is this good, bad, or average?
cheers
Brian
Since we are all sharing
[root@tamriel elx]#
David wrote:
Hello experts,
Last evening I installed MD8.2, and reformatted my / and /usr
partitions as xfs. Now, just about everything seems to be running slower
than MD8.1 on ext3 partitions.
Did I smoke too much grass in my younger years or is this a reality?
Is there
J. Craig Woods wrote:
David wrote:
Hello experts,
Last evening I installed MD8.2, and reformatted my / and /usr
partitions as xfs. Now, just about everything seems to be running slower
than MD8.1 on ext3 partitions.
Did I smoke too much grass in my younger years or is this a reality?
Is
On my system I get:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.68 seconds = 38.10 MB/sec
Is this good, bad, or average?
cheers
Brian
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 12:42, civileme wrote:
J. Craig Woods wrote:
David wrote:
Hello experts,
Last evening I installed MD8.2, and reformatted my /
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 07:56 pm, you wrote:
On my system I get:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.68 seconds = 38.10 MB/sec
Is this good, bad, or average?
I'm guessing it is good. I get only
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 5.22 seconds = 12.26 MB/sec
I'm using a 200mhz
Brian Parish wrote:
On my system I get:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.68 seconds = 38.10 MB/sec
Is this good, bad, or average?
cheers
Brian
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 12:42, civileme wrote:
J. Craig Woods wrote:
David wrote:
Hello experts,
Last evening I installed MD8.2, and
On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 20:42, civileme wrote:
actually hdparm -t /dev/hdx is more informative. The capital T
basically measures the bandwidth of your memory.
And if you are using software RAID, then it is less than informative.
It works OK for RAID1 and 4 but not so well for 0 or 5,
Yes, the lower case t in runing hdparm gives you specific info on disc reads
but in knowing what the upper case T does will also help. I once had a
problem with my disc speed, and until I ran the T switch, I could not see it
was really a problem with my FSB speed. Turns out the mobo was not
12 matches
Mail list logo
