Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-11 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Dec 11, 2001 at 06:49:43AM -0500, Bill Shirley wrote: > Ok, in followed the instructions on the web page. Now mail from the > expert list is bouncing!! > Transcript of session follows. > > Out: 220 mail.shirleyfamily.net ESMTP Postfix (Postfix-19991231) > (Linux-Mandrake) > In: E

Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-11 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon Dec 10, 2001 at 11:16:34PM -0500, Mark Weaver wrote: > > Would you mind taking another look at it? It makes sense to me, but > > then I wrote it. It's not geared towards absolute newbies, but I > > don't think you need a physics degree to read it. Another look and > > some idea as to wh

RE: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-11 Thread Bill Shirley
TED] Subject: Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix On Mon Dec 10, 2001 at 09:25:49PM -0500, Mark Weaver wrote: > > Funny that this is mentioned... there is an article about SPAM on > > MandrakeSecure that discusses exactly what you're saying, Pierre... =) > > > &

Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Weaver
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 20:58:17 -0700 Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> frantically pecked out this message: > Not at all. It's shared weight between postfix and qmail... The > first part is about adding RBL support to both postfix and qmail. > What was confusing about it? The second part dea

Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon Dec 10, 2001 at 09:25:49PM -0500, Mark Weaver wrote: > > Funny that this is mentioned... there is an article about SPAM on > > MandrakeSecure that discusses exactly what you're saying, Pierre... =) > > > > http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/spam.php > > > > that article appears to be

Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Weaver
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 12:30:29 -0700 Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Funny that this is mentioned... there is an article about SPAM on > MandrakeSecure that discusses exactly what you're saying, Pierre... =) > > http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/spam.php > that article appears to

Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Weaver
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:57:24 -0500 Pierre Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Weaver wrote: > > > > Hi List, > > > > I've been thinking about something for a little while now and I was wondering if >anyone here on the list has Postfix installed and doing reverse lookups as a method >of c

Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Vincent Danen
On Mon Dec 10, 2001 at 09:57:24AM -0500, Pierre Fortin wrote: > > I've been thinking about something for a little while now and I was wondering if >anyone here on the list has Postfix installed and doing reverse lookups as a method >of controling the amount of SPAM coming into their mailservers

Re: [expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-10 Thread Pierre Fortin
Mark Weaver wrote: > > Hi List, > > I've been thinking about something for a little while now and I was wondering if >anyone here on the list has Postfix installed and doing reverse lookups as a method >of controling the amount of SPAM coming into their mailservers. Yes. There are problems t

[expert] reverse lookups with Postfix

2001-12-09 Thread Mark Weaver
Hi List, I've been thinking about something for a little while now and I was wondering if anyone here on the list has Postfix installed and doing reverse lookups as a method of controling the amount of SPAM coming into their mailservers. thanks, -- daRcmaTTeR =/\=??? |%C++ Registered L