Ohh, yes sorry! I've read the man surfacely and misunderstood that option
El Jue 07 Ago 2003 20:26, ed tharp escribió:
> On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 18:47, Sergio Javier Belkin wrote:
> > Thank everybody!
>
> 'man urpmi' can be your friend too...
>
> > El Jue 07 Ago 2003 03:38, Tom Brinkman escribió:
>
There is a way to install a rpm even if it is already installed with --force
when using rpm, but the question is exists a similar option for urpmi.
Thanks in advance and please Don't pay atention to the absurd SCO's
claims!
--
Obed Liberty
Software Libre al desktop
http://obed.com.ar
---
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 18:47, Sergio Javier Belkin wrote:
> Thank everybody!
'man urpmi' can be your friend too...
> El Jue 07 Ago 2003 03:38, Tom Brinkman escribió:
> > On Wednesday August 6 2003 11:12 pm, Sergio Javier Belkin wrote:
> > > There is a way to install a rpm even if it is already
On Wednesday August 6 2003 11:12 pm, Sergio Javier Belkin wrote:
> There is a way to install a rpm even if it is already installed
> with --force when using rpm, but the question is exists a similar
> option for urpmi.
--allow-force, there's also --allow-nodeps
Use sparingly and with
Thank everybody!
El Jue 07 Ago 2003 03:38, Tom Brinkman escribió:
> On Wednesday August 6 2003 11:12 pm, Sergio Javier Belkin wrote:
> > There is a way to install a rpm even if it is already installed
> > with --force when using rpm, but the question is exists a similar
> > option for urpmi.
>
>
Am Donnerstag, 7. August 2003 01:12 schrieb Sergio Javier Belkin:
> There is a way to install a rpm even if it is already installed with
> --force when using rpm, but the question is exists a similar option for
> urpmi. Thanks in advance and please Don't pay atention to the absurd
> SCO's claim
