On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 08:08, ed tharp wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 10:34, Jack Coates wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 06:31, ed tharp wrote:
> > > I am considering sending every win box that is requesting
> > > winnt/system32/cmd.exe with an 300 meg avi, renamed cmd.exe, and stored
> > > in a fo
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 10:34, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 06:31, ed tharp wrote:
> > I am considering sending every win box that is requesting
> > winnt/system32/cmd.exe with an 300 meg avi, renamed cmd.exe, and stored
> > in a folder off my Apache Document root named winnt/system32.
On 12 Oct 2003 09:31:12 -0400
ed tharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> I am considering sending every win box that is requesting
> winnt/system32/cmd.exe with an 300 meg avi, renamed cmd.exe, and
> stored in a folder off my Apache Document root named winnt/system32.
>
> I am wondering about the dr
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 06:31, ed tharp wrote:
> I am considering sending every win box that is requesting
> winnt/system32/cmd.exe with an 300 meg avi, renamed cmd.exe, and stored
> in a folder off my Apache Document root named winnt/system32.
>
> I am wondering about the drawbacks, other than the
I am considering sending every win box that is requesting
winnt/system32/cmd.exe with an 300 meg avi, renamed cmd.exe, and stored
in a folder off my Apache Document root named winnt/system32.
I am wondering about the drawbacks, other than the bandwidth waste and
tying up my pipe.
--
+
