On Monday 10 September 2001 14:09, Jason Van Patten wrote:
> At Mon Sep 10 19:27:50 2001, civileme wrote:
> > Reiser -- Fastest in our benchmarks. Still crashes or slows IO
> > intolerably on nfs after a day or two of heavy use. Stability problems
> > exist with
>
> I thought this was supposed t
On Monday 10 September 2001 12:25 pm, you wrote:
> On my 8.0 system, I'm using Reiser FS for all partitions except for /boot,
> which is ext2. I've seen on the web page about how 8.1 will have support
> for ext3 (which I presume is new?) in the kernel. And I've seen comments
> here which suggest
On Monday 10 September 2001 11:25, you wrote:
> On my 8.0 system, I'm using Reiser FS for all partitions except for /boot,
> which is ext2. I've seen on the web page about how 8.1 will have support
> for ext3 (which I presume is new?) in the kernel. And I've seen comments
> here which suggest th
> I've been running qmail on boxes with reiserfs filesystems for years and
> I've never had any problems with the two existing co-operatively.
Like I said, its just something i read on a comparison about the two. I cant
even remember the details of the problems.
--
Tom "Tomahawk" Badran
Depar
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] Reiser FS or ext3?
>
>
> On Mon 10 Sep at 17:47:20 +0100
On Mon 10 Sep at 17:47:20 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] done said:
>
> Ive seen benchmarks which suggest it is slower than reiserfs generally. Its
> main advantage is that you can convert existing ext2 partitions to ext3
> without reformatting them (not relevant in your case i believe). Ive also
> r
Try xfs.
I've been using reiserfs on all partitions for more than half a year, mostly
because of journaling. I have 600Mhz PIII with 128Mb RAM and the system
always seemed rather sluggish to me. I blamed it on kde, but when I I tried
xfs, everything started to fly, the wait times decreased almost
At Mon Sep 10 19:27:50 2001, civileme wrote:
>
> Reiser -- Fastest in our benchmarks. Still crashes or slows IO intolerably on
> nfs after a day or two of heavy use. Stability problems exist with
I thought this was supposed to be addressed in 2.4.8 or later. Not so?
jas
--
Jason V
On Monday 10 September 2001 12:25, David Guntner wrote:
> On my 8.0 system, I'm using Reiser FS for all partitions except for /boot,
> which is ext2. I've seen on the web page about how 8.1 will have support
> for ext3 (which I presume is new?) in the kernel. And I've seen comments
> here which
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Badran
Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2001 12:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Reiser FS or ext3?
On Monday 10 September 2001 5:25 pm, you wrote:
> On my 8.0 system, I'm using Reiser FS for all partitions except for /boot,
> which is ext2.
On Monday 10 September 2001 5:25 pm, you wrote:
> On my 8.0 system, I'm using Reiser FS for all partitions except for /boot,
> which is ext2. I've seen on the web page about how 8.1 will have support
> for ext3 (which I presume is new?) in the kernel. And I've seen comments
> here which suggest
11 matches
Mail list logo
