RE: [expert] digitally signed messages

2000-03-14 Thread Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.)
I second someone else's comment: Why? Digitally signed messages are the future. I've looked at the source of a signed message and the content is readable regardless of whether your email client can authenticate the signature. Digitally ENCRYPTED messages, OTOH, are a pain at this stage of the i

Re: [expert] digitally signed messages

2000-03-12 Thread John Aldrich
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, you wrote: > Please dont send thru digitally signed messages. > BTW, appreciate that you did NOT choose to use HTML... my compliments! John

Re: [expert] digitally signed messages

2000-03-12 Thread John Aldrich
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, you wrote: > Please dont send thru digitally signed messages. > Do you mean PGP-signed messages? Why? Is your MUA choking on it? I *could* be nasty and tell you what the "fine" folks in the "linux-smp" list told me ("your mail program is broken, go get another one.") but I won