Because that is how someone has set it up on their dns server. I did check
and it is not owned by RedHat at all.
Most likely just someone that was wanting the domain for email only and
wanted to play a joke on everyone else.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL
:>Because that is how someone has set it up on their dns server. I did check
:>and it is not owned by RedHat at all.
:>Most likely just someone that was wanting the domain for email only and
:>wanted to play a joke on everyone else.
This is the best practical joke I have seen in the long time...
At 01:16 AM 11/14/99 +0100, Denis Havlik wrote:
>:>Because that is how someone has set it up on their dns server. I did check
>:>and it is not owned by RedHat at all.
>:>Most likely just someone that was wanting the domain for email only and
>:>wanted to play a joke on everyone else.
>
>This is t
> Because that is how someone has set it up on their dns server.
Oops, I wasn't thinking before when I said someone submitted it to
Internic with that address. They just configured their bind server that
way.
I guess it's time for a cup of coffee...
--Derek
> I was not avare that one can put "private" IP - addresses in "public" DNS.
> Actually the fact that 127.0.0.1 address gets resolved over "public" DNS
> at all sounds completely weird to me. I have always thought
> all the internet infrastructure ignores non-routable IP-addreses.
You're
Humm... i wonder what that bogus address does to web bots. Might be a fun way
to make some bot traps.
-chris
Chris Roupp wrote:
>
> Humm... i wonder what that bogus address does to web bots. Might be a fun way
> to make some bot traps.
>
> -chris
If you don't run an HTTP server on the webbot machine, it will do
nothing.
--
Steve Philp
Network Administrator
Advance Packaging Corporation
[EMAIL PROTEC
