RE: [expert] sshd and simple networking

2000-12-05 Thread Daniel Woods
> i run sshd as a daemon. is there any reason for me to run inetd if i don't > allow telnet or ftp? inetd doesn't control bind and postfix right? i'd > like to lock down those two servers as much as i can. AFAIK, sshd daemon does not depend on inetd. It has been compiled with tcp_wrappers supp

RE: [expert] sshd and simple networking

2000-12-05 Thread SIR admin
those two servers as much as i can. matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Shirley Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 12:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [expert] sshd and simple networking That should be "s

RE: [expert] sshd and simple networking

2000-12-04 Thread Bill Shirley
That should be "sshd:" instead of "in.sshd:" HTH, Bill PS. Why to have a ": ALLOW" at the end of the line? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SIR admin Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 9:53 AM To: expert Subject: [expert] sshd and simple ne