On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Bradley D. Pierson wrote:
> I have a belkin 4 port router and for some reason mandrake 9.2 keeps
> killing my connection to the net. what can I do?
>
Check the "lisa" service. There was a lot of noise on the cooker list
during 9.2 development about it flooding the networ
You'll need to give us more information in order for us to help you. Can you
be specific as to what happens and when? The more details the better...
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bradley D. Pierson
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 05:42 pm, Dick Gevers wrote:
> There`s easier ways to tackle that; IMHO. Proberbly failsafe is safe, but
> why bother, if you`re careful and consider beforehand what you do, go to
> init 1 and cd to where you want to make your changes. Of course, vi may be
> the prefe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:42:00 +, Dick Gevers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: [expert] lm sensors:
Aargh, and I thought I cancelled this one just in time. Please waste. The
next version is the final. Sorry.
-BEGIN PGP SIG
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 02:52 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> I only load the it87. The lm75 driver may be causing your problem, there
> isn;t one on that board. Also, on the Soyo, I only got accurate readings
> by specifying a socket type when modprobing the driver. the differnet
> types are in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Bryan,
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:36:51 -0500, Bryan Phinney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about [expert] lm sensors:
>Scenario, I installed lmsensors by RPM, ran sensors-detect and let it
>create the /etc/sysconfig/lmsensors configuration file. When
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:36:51 -0500, Bryan Phinney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about [expert] lm sensors:
>Scenario, I installed lmsensors by RPM, ran sensors-detect and let it
>create the /etc/sysconfig/lmsensors configuration file. When I restarted
>t
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 06:47, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 November 2003 09:24 am, Timothy Brown wrote:
> > After you get it started now go to your browser and go to
> > https://localhost:1 make sur you have https
> >
>
> Right, I know how to access it manually. I was just wonderi
From: "Praedor Atrebates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>In the interest of avoiding hard lockups and troubleshooting THAT (see the
>lm_sensors thread) when all I want to do is troubleshoot my sound problems,
>which lm_sensor module(s) should I load in order to use dmidecode? I would
>like to restrict the m
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 03:36 pm, Björn Lundin wrote:
> Jason Williams wrote:
>
>
>
> > Does urpmi have the ability to pull security patches down and
> > automatically install?
>
You just have to define an update source. All the update mirrors have the
same ../base/hdlist.cz format as the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In the interest of avoiding hard lockups and troubleshooting THAT (see the
lm_sensors thread) when all I want to do is troubleshoot my sound problems,
which lm_sensor module(s) should I load in order to use dmidecode? I would
like to restrict the m
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 02:03 pm, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> in order to solve wich one kills your system, you should use the modprobe
> command
> and try to load one module at a time until it hangs...
Originally, the problem module was the adm1021 module and that was due to the
options line
At 09:36 PM 11/19/2003 +0100, you wrote:
This might help you.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ cat /etc/cron.weekly/update_mdk
#!/bin/bash
#Keeps the system updated
urpmi.update -a --wget && urpmi --wget --auto --auto-select --no-verify-rpm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$
you might want to change that to just g
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 06:23, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> This is dead simple and works well. Altho Pascal seems to
> indicate it can be done as user. For me that wouldn't work, but
> as root 'mkrescue --iso' created a bootable image named
> "rescue.iso" (3.2 mb)in the directory I ran the comman
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 12:36 pm, Bryan Phinney wrote:
> I have recently started trying to install lm sensors on my computer which
> has a Soyo KT400 Dragon Ultra Platinum motherboard. I have had very mixed
> results with the sensors including some very hard to diagnose hard locks on
> the m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'll send the information you request later today. Unfortunately I am at work
and thus not able to access my desktop system.
Not the same thing but on a related note, I did run through the
troubleshooting process outlined by harddrake (ie, lspci
From: "Praedor Atrebates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Your sound system is virtually identical to mine. I have also installed
aumix
>and maxed out all the sliders.
>
>All I can say is that when I use 2.4.21 kernels, sound works flawlessly.
If I
>use anything in the 2.4.22 list, no sound. Sound works in
From: "Bryan Phinney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> I rewrote the lmsensors init script so that it was manually loading the
> modules rather than pulling them from the /etc/sysconfig/lmsensors file.
I
> ran the script and it loaded the modules, then stopped the script and it
> unloaded the modules.
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 05:15 pm, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
> > The sound works just fine. I did have to install
> > aumix-2.8-6mdk (it wasn't installed by default) and move all
> > it's sliders to 100%, then do the same in kmix. I'm now
> > running 10.0, but the sound worked with a 9.2 fresh
At 06:20 PM 11/19/2003 +, you wrote:
urpmq will search all available media unless you force it to use a specific
media with --media or restrict it to update media with --update
It may be your 'main' source is not configured properly or maybe you are just
being misled by the way urpmq will retu
On Wednesday 19 Nov 2003 5:41 pm, Jason Williams wrote:
SNIP
>
> One last question regarding sources for urpmi.
> I've been playing around with the commands to add media and remove media,
> just to get a feel for things.
> The only question I have now, is that when I do a search for samba, it only
At 02:41 AM 11/19/2003 +, you wrote:
It is the tree on the mirror that is broken. We will have to wait until it is
fixed.
It is the file 'list' in the contrib folder that is out of date. The list
includes the old kernel packages that were replaced.
I do not know how urpmi uses the list file. I
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 11:50 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Your sound system is virtually identical to mine. I have also installed
> aumix and maxed out all the sliders.
>
> All I can say is that when I use 2.4.21 kernels, sound works fla
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 08:50, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Your sound system is virtually identical to mine. I have also installed aumix
> and maxed out all the sliders.
>
> All I can say is that when I use 2.4.21 kernels, sound works flawlessl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heh. APIC is enabled in bios because if I disable it, Mandrake 9.2, no matter
what kernel I use, will not bootup. Instead, I get a blank black screen and
that's all she wrote.
I have tried APIC 1.1 and 1.4 versions or tables (the two options op
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 05:41 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 November 2003 02:54 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> > At least with regards to sound.
> >
> > I must now give up on any 9.2 stock kernels. I have now failed
> > to get my fully functional sound system to work in 9.2 usi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Your sound system is virtually identical to mine. I have also installed aumix
and maxed out all the sliders.
All I can say is that when I use 2.4.21 kernels, sound works flawlessly. If I
use anything in the 2.4.22 list, no sound. Sound works in
Even more helpful hints!!!
Thanks ALL.
This should go into some FAQ somewhere
--- Tom Brinkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 November 2003 03:04 pm, Ricardo
> (Tru64 User)
> wrote:
> > --- Rolf Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > You could recompile a smaller kernel. I
> >
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 02:54 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> At least with regards to sound.
>
> I must now give up on any 9.2 stock kernels. I have now failed
> to get my fully functional sound system to work in 9.2 using:
> default kernel 2.4.22-10mdk, 2.4.22-21mdk, 2.4.22 multimedia
>
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 03:04 pm, Ricardo (Tru64 User)
wrote:
> --- Rolf Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could recompile a smaller kernel. I
>
> > have made a boot iso,
> > burned to cd, which works as a boot cd, by using
> > isolinux, part of the
> > syslinux package. Read /usr/
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 23:36, Rob Blomquist wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2003 6:31 am, Jack Coates wrote:
>
> > > Well, I found that the problem is not with the sound card, thanks to you
> > > guys. Bjorn gave me a tip in the options cs4232 line with the mpuirq=10,
> > > and I got it up and runn
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 09:54 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> Can anyone suggest a way of getting a 9.1 kernel to build/install/function
> on a 9.2 install?
You should be able to just grab the last 9.1 kernel and install it.
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a d
--- Rolf Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could recompile a smaller kernel. I
> have made a boot iso,
> burned to cd, which works as a boot cd, by using
> isolinux, part of the
> syslinux package. Read /usr/share/doc/sylinux-*
> and, if you are
> interested, I could try to recall how I
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 09:24 am, Timothy Brown wrote:
> After you get it started now go to your browser and go to
> https://localhost:1 make sur you have https
>
Right, I know how to access it manually. I was just wondering if I missed
a K-menu entry to start a browser with that URL.
Ricardo (Tru64 User) wrote:
Forgive me if this has been discussed.
I tried it with 3 different machines, 4 different
floppies.
"A Error Occurred. mkbootdisk failed" or
"Unable to properly close mkbootdisk, No space left on
device"
My problem is that I have dualboot scenarios..with
winblows.a
Ricardo (Tru64 User) wrote:
> Forgive me if this has been discussed.
> I tried it with 3 different machines, 4 different
> floppies.
> "A Error Occurred. mkbootdisk failed" or
> "Unable to properly close mkbootdisk, No space left on
> device"
> My problem is that I have dualboot scenarios..wi
After you get it started now go to your browser and go to
https://localhost:1 make sur you have https
Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 03:13 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 06:57, Greg Meyer wrote:
If you want a pointy-clicky config interface and you
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 03:13 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 06:57, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > If you want a pointy-clicky config interface and you don't like
> > DrakConf, use Webmin -- it doesn't have that problem. It's also better
> > at handling complex config than DrakC
stdio.h should be included with every c/c++ compiler. It is a basic
include file for the c language
Tim
James Sparenberg wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 06:23, Jarmo wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 16:01, Jarmo wrote:
The point why I started to look,was that I can't get lm-sensors 2.8.0
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 07:50 am, L.V.Gandhi wrote:
> I have Pixelview PlayTV Pak TV tuner card which comes with camera connected
> to tuner card. I have to use windows for netmeeting or yahoo video
> conferencing because of this camera. has anybody used this camera in linux
> for
> gnomemeet
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 00:22, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 23:36, Rob Blomquist wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 November 2003 6:31 am, Jack Coates wrote:
> >
> > > > Well, I found that the problem is not with the sound card, thanks to you
> > > > guys. Bjorn gave me a tip in the options
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 23:36, Rob Blomquist wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2003 6:31 am, Jack Coates wrote:
>
> > > Well, I found that the problem is not with the sound card, thanks to you
> > > guys. Bjorn gave me a tip in the options cs4232 line with the mpuirq=10,
> > > and I got it up and runn
>
> When I tried doing the line you defined above, I get this output:
>
> find: paths must precede expression
> Usage: find [path...] [expression]
> rm: too few arguments
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
>
> So I did it this way:
>
> find /var/log -type f -mtime 5 | xargs rm
>
> And it
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 16:00, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 06:57, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 November 2003 08:29 am, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
> > > Now I'll have to beat the "Sparenberg" drum - this clearly deserves a bug
> > > report. I can't do it yet, since I've just ordered
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 6:31 am, Jack Coates wrote:
> > Well, I found that the problem is not with the sound card, thanks to you
> > guys. Bjorn gave me a tip in the options cs4232 line with the mpuirq=10,
> > and I got it up and running, but only in console. Yep, in tty1, I was
> > able to pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:15:17 -0800, Michael Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about Re: [expert] garbage collection ?:
>LOL :) Yeah, you're bringing the pizza, right? :)
Sure, if you take care of the beer & whiskey, no sweat.
that's right... it conflicts with initscripts and ppp
it wouldn't install - I have no idea how to resolve these issues so
just gave it away.
Cheers
anton
Anton.
Don't use dialup ATT myself but I think the rpm you need is called
gpppwrap just do urpmi gpppwrap and try it out.
James
Praed
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 13:22, Dick Gevers wrote:
> Okay. Is this a poker game?
LOL :) Yeah, you're bringing the pizza, right? :)
> Running [EMAIL PROTECTED] niced at -5
'Nice' sets the schedule priority - ok, what does that mean? How does
that affect your performance both overall and for the sp
On Wednesday 19 Nov 2003 1:21 am, Jason Williams wrote:
snip
>
> >That error with
> >"medium "contrib" uses an invalid list file:
> >mirror is probably not up-to-date, trying to use alternate method"
> >
> >is a temporary issue because the list file on the mirrors is currently out
> > of date. It d
At 12:40 AM 11/19/2003 +, you wrote:
For urpmq --fuzzy you need to supply a string parameter
For example urpmq --fuzzy samba
Doh! Whoops...makes sense now. :)
That error with
"medium "contrib" uses an invalid list file:
mirror is probably not up-to-date, trying to use alternate method"
is a
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 07:40 pm, Derek Jennings wrote:
> is a temporary issue because the list file on the mirrors is currently out
> of date. It does not affect the operation of urpmi. It is just an
> annoyance.
This is really only a cooker problem. The distribution mirrors should be
fine.
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 07:27 pm, Jason Williams wrote:
> $ urpmq -i samba3-common
> medium "contrib" uses an invalid list file:
>mirror is probably not up-to-date, trying to use alternate method
>
> Still gives the description, but that error is something i'd like to
> correct.
This happe
On Wednesday 19 Nov 2003 12:27 am, Jason Williams wrote:
> Ok...not sure if this should go here, but so far, i've had no luck in
> trying to resolve my problems with urpmi.
>
> Just did a fresh install of 9.2 on one of our IBM servers.
>
> I used the easy urpmi site to setup my urpmi servers so I c
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 06:57, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2003 08:29 am, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
> > Now I'll have to beat the "Sparenberg" drum - this clearly deserves a bug
> > report. I can't do it yet, since I've just ordered my 9.2 boxed set, and
> > don't have 9.2 installed on a
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 08:29 am, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
> Now I'll have to beat the "Sparenberg" drum - this clearly deserves a bug
> report. I can't do it yet, since I've just ordered my 9.2 boxed set, and
> don't have 9.2 installed on any systems.
A bug report probably will get ignored bec
On Tuesday 18 Nov 2003 8:07 pm, Jason Williams wrote:
> Last question.
>
> Is there a way to get a package description of the available
> packages through urpmi?
> I swear I was able to do so, but dont recall how to do it now. :/
>
In 9.1, using the gui, there's a check-box for 'maximum information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:35:46 -0800, Michael Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about Re: [expert] garbage collection ?:
>Ok, now I'm seeing what you guys are saying. I did cat /proc/meminfo
>and got similar results. Then I started vmwa
On September 1993 plus 3729 days Rob Blomquist wrote:
> So the big question is how do you upgrade? Or maybe you don't. Or maybe you
> use urpmi to pull off an upgrade that does not interfere. I wanna know, cause
> I love linux, but I don't want to be a slave to my computer.
I urpmi...I've bee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:43:06 +, elPunishar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: [expert] garbage collection ?:
>what i meant was: the process of using up all avalable memory is much
>slower than on windows.
>the machine runs a LOT
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 11:36, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 10:18, Michael Holt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 10:11, Jack Coates wrote:
> >
> > > > Curious, I have 512M ram and 256M swap - top shows I'm using 198M of mem
> > > > and none of my swap - I've been running my compu
At 12:17 PM 11/18/2003 -0800, you wrote:
urpmi urpmc and then use it to find what's available. (Only in 9.2 att
but the src rpm does build on 9.1)
Ok...grabbed urpmc.
I currently dont have any samba or LDAP installed. However, in playing with
urpmi, I see there are quite a few packages available
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 11:37, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 11:16, Michael Holt wrote:
> > Hey,
> > I need to know where to go to add the java binary to my path - who do I
> > modify?
>
> just you: edit ~/.bash_profile
> JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/j2re1.4.0_01/
> export JAVA_HOME
> PATH=$PATH
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 12:07, Jason Williams wrote:
> Last question.
>
> Is there a way to get a package description of the available packages
> through urpmi?
> I swear I was able to do so, but dont recall how to do it now. :/
urpmi urpmc and then use it to find what's available. (Only in 9.2 a
Last question.
Is there a way to get a package description of the available packages
through urpmi?
I swear I was able to do so, but dont recall how to do it now. :/
On a side note, anyone have any thoughts on whether 9.1 or 9.2 is better
suited for production right now?
Jason
At 08:37 AM 11/
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 12:02, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> From: "James Sparenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 03:32, Angelo Naselli wrote:
> > > So there isn't any problem is it?
> > > I saw this thing because of a system that seems to be
> > > slower and with more hd access so i ass
From: "James Sparenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 03:32, Angelo Naselli wrote:
> > So there isn't any problem is it?
> > I saw this thing because of a system that seems to be
> > slower and with more hd access so i assumed the
> > message
> >
> > ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus sp
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 06:23, Jarmo wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2003 16:01, Jarmo wrote:
> > The point why I started to look,was that I can't get lm-sensors 2.8.0
> > compiled...Yes I know there is rpm...But I have so exotic mb... Asrock
> > K7S8X with sis cipset,exept sensors are winbonds...
>
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 05:10, Jarmo wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2003 14:41, Stew Benedict wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Jarmo wrote:
> > > Anybody know reasom,why gcc-3.3.2 was downgraded in 9.2 into 3.3.1?
> > > In 9.1 it was 3.3.2.
> >
> > It wasn't. 9.1 has 3.2.2.
>
> Sorry...Missunderstan
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 03:32, Angelo Naselli wrote:
> So there isn't any problem is it?
> I saw this thing because of a system that seems to be
> slower and with more hd access so i assumed the
> message
>
> ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes;
> override with idebus=xx
>
> as some
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 11:16, Michael Holt wrote:
> Hey,
> I need to know where to go to add the java binary to my path - who do I
> modify?
just you: edit ~/.bash_profile
JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/j2re1.4.0_01/
export JAVA_HOME
PATH=$PATH:$JAVA_HOME/bin
everyone -- edit /etc/profile and add the same.
-
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 10:18, Michael Holt wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 10:11, Jack Coates wrote:
>
> > > Curious, I have 512M ram and 256M swap - top shows I'm using 198M of mem
> > > and none of my swap - I've been running my computer all morning and I've
> > > got a few apps open. Why would
http://www.mandrakeclub.com/article.php?sid=1302
The powerpack ones are at the bottom of the page I believe.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lyvim Xaphir
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [e
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Daniel Axtell wrote:
> XFree86 runs OK, but when I
> reboot I frequently get a black screen. When I unplug the monitor for a few
> seconds and get a "no signal" message, then plug it in, everything is OK.
> I noticed a similar behavior on a different box when I was installing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks. Actually, I DO suspect apic/apci (I can never keep the two straight).
If I disable APIC in the kernel, then 9.2 will not bootup. It freezes
shortly after starting the bootup process. This was true during install as
well. I had to turn o
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 10:11, Jack Coates wrote:
> > Curious, I have 512M ram and 256M swap - top shows I'm using 198M of mem
> > and none of my swap - I've been running my computer all morning and I've
> > got a few apps open. Why would 80% of 1G of memory be normal?
>
> well, it's normal for m
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:46:15 -0500
Praedor Atrebates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed on electronic parchment:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Unfortunately the mute/unmute trick with aumix didn't work for me. All I
> get is very faint static over the speakers whenever I manipul
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 09:50, Michael Holt wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 06:35, Jack Coates wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 01:30, elPunishar wrote:
> > > hi everybody,
> > >
> > > i noticed that my 1 gig of ram is getting filled up real quick, which may be
> > > okay since i'm running a lot of
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 06:35, Jack Coates wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 01:30, elPunishar wrote:
> > hi everybody,
> >
> > i noticed that my 1 gig of ram is getting filled up real quick, which may be
> > okay since i'm running a lot of programs.
> > BUT it doesn't come down again even when i clos
ember 18, 2003 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Linuxconf
Well I long time ago I used it but for the last few
years I have been
using Mandrake I have used 8.2-9.2
Tim
Tango Echo wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Charlie M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: M
3 11:37 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [expert] Linuxconf
>
>
>Well I long time ago I used it but for the last few
years I have been
>using Mandrake I have used 8.2-9.2
>Tim
>
>
>
>
>Tango Echo wrote:
>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>
Well I long time ago I used it but for the last few years I have been
using Mandrake I have used 8.2-9.2
Tim
Tango Echo wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Charlie M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Linuxconf
>-Original Message-
>From: Charlie M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:23 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [expert] Linuxconf
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Monday 17 November 2003 9:13 am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Unfortunately the mute/unmute trick with aumix didn't work for me. All I get
is very faint static over the speakers whenever I manipulate the volume
sliders (pretty much any of them). If I crank up my speaker volume to max
and try to test sound/ar
Lawson, Jim wrote:
What is the difference? Does silver offer anything more?
Silver members could download the isos of the powerpack through bittorrent.
However, standard members have the download edition + access to all
commercial packages, so you have exactly the equivalent of a powerpack.
You
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 21:41, Rob Blomquist wrote:
> On Monday 17 November 2003 9:22 am, Björn Lundin wrote:
> > James Sparenberg wrote:
> > >
> > > Rob draksound AFAIK is only effective on PCI type cards. Since your is
> > > ISA, using the old standby of sndconfig (just urpmi sndconfig) This
> >
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 01:30, elPunishar wrote:
> hi everybody,
>
> i noticed that my 1 gig of ram is getting filled up real quick, which may be
> okay since i'm running a lot of programs.
> BUT it doesn't come down again even when i close the programs... memory use
> just grows and grows (slow b
What is the difference? Does silver offer anything more?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Which Mandrake to Buy?
Lawson, Jim wrote:
>I think 120 a year is high
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 16:01, Jarmo wrote:
> The point why I started to look,was that I can't get lm-sensors 2.8.0
> compiled...Yes I know there is rpm...But I have so exotic mb... Asrock
> K7S8X with sis cipset,exept sensors are winbonds...
No worry anymore.Downloaded lm-sensors 2.8.1 as wel
Lawson, Jim wrote:
I think 120 a year is high. I would like to see this at 80.
120 is the silver level, 60 is for standard.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 15:39, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> so it's definately 3.2.2
SORRY GUYS..
Too much reading...Have to cut whole forrest to see trees...;-)
Or wash my glasses
Damn me.
The point why I started to look,was that I can't get lm-sensors 2.8.0
compiled...Yes I know
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 12:31 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2003 06:08 am, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> > I have read about some problems when using more than 768 Mb
> > ram and the advise has always been passing "mem=860" at the
> > lilo prompt or in lilo.conf.
>
> Or use the Enterpr
From: "Jarmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tuesday 18 November 2003 14:41, Stew Benedict wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Jarmo wrote:
> > > Anybody know reasom,why gcc-3.3.2 was downgraded in 9.2 into 3.3.1?
> > > In 9.1 it was 3.3.2.
> >
> > It wasn't. 9.1 has 3.2.2.
>
> Sorry...Missunderstanding...M
Now I'll have to beat the "Sparenberg" drum - this clearly deserves a bug
report. I can't do it yet, since I've just ordered my 9.2 boxed set, and
don't have 9.2 installed on any systems.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Jarmo wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2003 14:41, Stew Benedict wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Jarmo wrote:
> > > Anybody know reasom,why gcc-3.3.2 was downgraded in 9.2 into 3.3.1?
> > > In 9.1 it was 3.3.2.
> >
> > It wasn't. 9.1 has 3.2.2.
>
> Sorry...Missunderstanding..
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 14:41, Stew Benedict wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Jarmo wrote:
> > Anybody know reasom,why gcc-3.3.2 was downgraded in 9.2 into 3.3.1?
> > In 9.1 it was 3.3.2.
>
> It wasn't. 9.1 has 3.2.2.
Sorry...Missunderstanding...My BAD BAD English...
In 9.1 it is 3.3.2
In 9.2 it
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Jarmo wrote:
> Anybody know reasom,why gcc-3.3.2 was downgraded in 9.2 into 3.3.1?
> In 9.1 it was 3.3.2.
>
It wasn't. 9.1 has 3.2.2.
--
Stew Benedict
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 06:08 am, Adolfo Bello wrote:
> I have read about some problems when using more than 768 Mb ram and the
> advise has always been passing "mem=860" at the lilo prompt or in
> lilo.conf.
Or use the Enterprise kernel.
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a boo
I really wish it still worked becasue while I do know enough to not use
it. It just makes life easier
Tim
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2003 10:40 pm, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2003 12:15 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2003 11:13 am, Timothy B
So there isn't any problem is it?
I saw this thing because of a system that seems to be
slower and with more hd access so i assumed the
message
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes;
override with idebus=xx
as something wrong on my system.
--- James Sparenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 18 Nov 2003 11:43 am, elPunishar wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 Nov 2003 9:42 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 Nov 2003 9:30 am, elPunishar wrote:
> > > hi everybody,
> > >
> > > i noticed that my 1 gig of ram is getting filled up real quick,
> > > which may be okay since i'm running a l
1 - 100 of 59667 matches
Mail list logo
