On Sunday 10 March 2002 11:33, Hari Yellina wrote:
Hi.
I am just wondering , why u guys are using mandrake over other linux
flavour . Can u guys tell me the advantages,
Hardware detection, wich is the best you can find around there.
I don't like other things, like some filesystem choices
Ashley Reynolds wrote:
I couldn't agree more. Mandrake just feels good, after using it and
then trying to use another distribution, for instance, Red Hat or Debian,
I just don't feel as comfortable. Whilst Debian is what I run on most of
my servers, it still takes far longer to configure
:)
Thanks
gadir
From: Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ExpertMandrake-List [EMAIL PROTECTED], NewbieMandrake-List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Why u guys are using mandrake rather than other linux
flavours
Date: 12 Mar 2002 11:20:03 -0500
On Sun, 2002
I enjoy it because it's easy to install and configure =)
From: Gary A. Garibaldi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/03/11 Mon PM 03:10:35 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Why u guys are using mandrake rather than other linux flavours
On Sunday 10 March 2002 08:17 am, you wrote
On Sunday 10 March 2002 05:33 am, Hari Yellina wrote:
Hi.
I am just wondering , why u guys are using mandrake over other linux
flavour . Can u guys tell me the advantages,
Thank you,
Hari Yellina
I saw a computer show last year (The ScreenSavers) where it was presented
as a
] Why u guys are using mandrake rather than other linux
flavours
On Sunday 10 March 2002 05:33 am, you wrote:
Hi.
I am just wondering , why u guys are using mandrake over other linux
flavour . Can u guys tell me the advantages,
I started by installing RedHat 5.1 and the concurrent
On Sunday 10 March 2002 05:33 am, Hari Yellina wrote:
Hi.
I am just wondering , why u guys are using mandrake over other linux
flavour . Can u guys tell me the advantages,
Thank you,
Hari Yellina
Hari:
I started with Mandrake (7.0) because of its easy and comprehensive
installation.
Hari Yellina wrote:
I am just wondering , why u guys are using mandrake over other linux flavour
. Can u guys tell me the advantages,
I'm sure the answer varies. For me, I started Linux with a succesful
install of Caldera 2.2, then collected 10 or so distributions from my
local LUG, and
Hari Yellina wrote:
I am just wondering , why u guys are using mandrake over other linux flavour
. Can u guys tell me the advantages,
Sorry if this is a duplicate -- my mail client died while sending and it
suggested I try again -- I have made a few minor changes compared to the
original if
On Sunday 10 March 2002 05:33 am, you wrote:
Hi.
I am just wondering , why u guys are using mandrake over other linux
flavour . Can u guys tell me the advantages,
I started by installing RedHat 5.1 and the concurrent versions of Debian,
Slackware and SuSE. I was most successful with Red
I am not. I am ALSO using Mandrake (8.0). All of my production stuff is
there and I haven't bothered to move it. I loaded SuSE 7.3 and found it to
have many fewer rough edges. This was not always so. I have used Mandrake
since 6.5 (at least) and 7.2 was da bomb. 8.0 seemed to be a step
You may get as many answers as OS's out there, but for me the focus is more
usability for the desktop. It also makes a hell of a server OS also. Easier to
install... easier to administer. I started out with Red hat and started watching
Mandrake about 3 years ago. They would take the Red Hat
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 15:16:20 -0500
mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
I am not. I am ALSO using Mandrake (8.0). All of my production stuff is
there and I haven't bothered to move it. I loaded SuSE 7.3 and found it
to have many fewer rough edges. This was not
On Sunday 10 March 2002 06:14 pm, you wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002 15:16:20 -0500
mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] studiouisly spake these words to ponder:
I am not. I am ALSO using Mandrake (8.0). All of my production stuff is
there and I haven't bothered to move it. I loaded SuSE 7.3 and found it
14 matches
Mail list logo
