On Sat Jan 12, 2002 at 12:53:32PM +, David Stevenson wrote:
> I was thinking about that, but I am put off by the 32mb or ram min quoted on the MDK
>site. The laptop only has 8mb. I have succesfully loaded mdk 6 and 8 on the laptop,
>although I did not install any WM's or X as I thought it m
On 12 Jan 2002 12:24:41 +0100
Tobias Marx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was thinking about that, but I am put off by the 32mb or ram min quoted on the MDK
site. The laptop only has 8mb. I have succesfully loaded mdk 6 and 8 on the laptop,
although I did not install any WM's or X as I thought it
btw, what about mandrake snf (single network firewall)? it's based on
mandrake 7.2 (ala kernel 2.2.19) and should support every hardware the
"standard" mdk 7.2 supports.
on a first glance it seems as if it supports the same features as
smoothwall, too. you'll find it here:
http://www.mandrakesoft.
On Saturday 05 January 2002 2:34 pm, you wrote:
> At 07:06 PM 1/5/2002 -0500, DStevenson wrote:
> >Is this the document that tells you to install a bloated full OS and then
> >hack it with
> >smoothwall, eemm. On a Laptop with 800Meg, 16Mb Ram and, yes, dx400 100
> > cpu?
> >
> >If not, I would a
At 07:06 PM 1/5/2002 -0500, DStevenson wrote:
>Is this the document that tells you to install a bloated full OS and then
>hack it with
>smoothwall, eemm. On a Laptop with 800Meg, 16Mb Ram and, yes, dx400 100 cpu?
>
>If not, I would appreciate the url.
>
>Thanks for being interested enough to look
On Saturday 05 January 2002 12:21 pm, you wrote:
> At 11:02 AM 1/4/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I did take a look and did notice that there was a problem, as I mentioned
> >in the first email I sent on this thread...however I noticed that the new
> >release 0.9.9 had been released...so
At 11:02 AM 1/4/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I did take a look and did notice that there was a problem, as I mentioned
>in the first email I sent on this thread...however I noticed that the new
>release 0.9.9 had been released...so I was wondering if this version
>supported pcmcia.
>
>
>I did take a look , and since it uses the Linux kernel version, 2.2.19, it
>must be using ipchains. It does look to be very cool but if
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" STFW, he or she will see that there is a
>problem when using Smoothwall with pcmcia hardware..
I did take a look and did notice that
At 11:31 PM 1/4/2002 +1100, ze0 wrote:
>Smoothwall is a light-weight Linux distribution, basically dedicated
>to firewalling. I'm not sure which it uses, iptables or ipchains.
>
>You can read about it here:
>
>http://www.smoothwall.org
>
>I haven't used it myself, but I hear it is VERY good.
Than
Smoothwall is a light-weight Linux distribution, basically dedicated
to firewalling. I'm not sure which it uses, iptables or ipchains.
You can read about it here:
http://www.smoothwall.org
I haven't used it myself, but I hear it is VERY good.
Kindest Regards,
Ashley (aka ze0).
|-
10 matches
Mail list logo
