Ulf Rompe wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 04.11.2007, 20:14 -0500 schrieb Daniel Falk: > >> I'm wondering if this fits in with a workflow that doesn't want to >> keep the raws forever. I'm wondering this because that's the boat I'm >> in. I take way too many pictures and have too little hard drive >> capacity to keep the raws around, but the actual jpgs I'd like to >> keep. What would be the best way to do that? There just doesn't seem >> like a really good way to either a) import only jpgs or b) replace >> raws with jpgs after import. >> > > I could imagine a simple extension that gives you an additional menu > item called something like "Delete RAW versions of selected photos". > Right now digging my way into F-Spot extension hacking, I would say such > an extension would be easy to implement. > > [x] ulf > > That would be very good. Although currently I'm archiving the RAW's to DVD along with their sidecar files so that if I do want to go back and look at them later I can. I should have been more specific in my original posting.
Could you suggest a solution to this? It could be as simple as instead of deleting the raws, moving them to a predefined directory where they can later be archived off to a disc. Thing is, I'm also not sure how the sidecar file (which I think is called *.ufraw in this case) is handled in f-spot, nor do I know if UFRaw allows those files to be moved around to different directory locations. _______________________________________________ F-spot-list mailing list F-spot-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list