Ulf Rompe wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 04.11.2007, 20:14 -0500 schrieb Daniel Falk:
>   
>> I'm wondering if this fits in with a workflow that doesn't want to
>> keep the raws forever.  I'm wondering this because that's the boat I'm
>> in.  I take way too many pictures and have too little hard drive
>> capacity to keep the raws around, but the actual jpgs I'd like to
>> keep.  What would be the best way to do that?  There just doesn't seem
>> like a really good way to either a) import only jpgs or b) replace
>> raws with jpgs after import.
>>     
>
> I could imagine a simple extension that gives you an additional menu
> item called something like "Delete RAW versions of selected photos".
> Right now digging my way into F-Spot extension hacking, I would say such
> an extension would be easy to implement.
>
> [x] ulf 
>
>   
That would be very good.  Although currently I'm archiving the RAW's to 
DVD along with their sidecar files so that if I do want to go back and 
look at them later I can.  I should have been more specific in my 
original posting.

Could you suggest a solution to this?  It could be as simple as instead 
of deleting the raws, moving them to a predefined directory where they 
can later be archived off to a disc.  Thing is, I'm also not sure how 
the sidecar file (which I think is called *.ufraw in this case) is 
handled in f-spot, nor do I know if UFRaw allows those files to be moved 
around to different directory locations.
_______________________________________________
F-spot-list mailing list
F-spot-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list

Reply via email to