Nice.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Joe Groff wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:35 AM, L N wrote:
>
>> Wondering if there is a way to do type-checking in Factor.
>>
>> Sorry for the inundation of questions.
>>
>> Factor is a fascinating new environment.
>>
>> Runtime type checking is provide
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:21 AM, L N wrote:
> Wondering if Factor has something similar.
>
For trivial things like rewriting 'swap swap', we let the compiler's
optimizer deal with those. It performs many of those optimizations. To
implement your own compile-time transforms, you can use Factor's
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:35 AM, L N wrote:
> Wondering if there is a way to do type-checking in Factor.
>
> Sorry for the inundation of questions.
>
> Factor is a fascinating new environment.
>
> Runtime type checking is provided by the `typed` module:
USE: typed
TYPED: f+ ( x: float y: float
Wondering if there is a way to do type-checking in Factor.
Sorry for the inundation of questions.
Factor is a fascinating new environment.
- Leonard
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf
This seems like a good idea ...
> MetaCat and Rewriting Rules
>
> Cat has no lexical environment and only a single stack. This makes it very
> easy to rewrite Cat code. The Cat interpreter comes with a built-in term
> rewriting system called MetaCat that is activated using the "#metacat" or
> "#m"
http://factor-language.blogspot.com/2009/09/survey-of-domain-specific-languages-in.html
Take a look.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:13 AM, L N wrote:
> Found an article about "domain specific languages" ...
>
> http://www.onboard.jetbrains.com/articles/04/10/lop/
>
> The argument is that coding in do
Found an article about "domain specific languages" ...
http://www.onboard.jetbrains.com/articles/04/10/lop/
The argument is that coding in domain-specific-terms is the natural way.
Wondering how the idea of vocabularies in Factor is related to the idea of
"domain specific languages".
http://doc
Here's a taste of what it could possibly look like:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2010/08/07/jonesforth-git-repository/
Look at the links below "The original tutorial is in two parts".
rien
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 1:48 PM, L N wrote:
> Found this awhile back from a google search ...
>
> http://andy
Found this awhile back from a google search ...
http://andy.junkdrome.org/devel/manos/proposal
The idea is to implement an operating system almost completely in TCL. A
minimum amount of low-level C-libraries is also allowed.
What would it be like to implement an operating system almost entirely
